Tuesday, 25 March 2014

A new window into an old world

March 25, 2014

Updated: March 25, 2014 08:47 IST

Vasudevan Mukunth

That cosmic inflation may have happened at a higher-than-anticipated energy means physicists have access to the young universe through astronomical data

On March 17, radio astronomers from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Massachusetts, announced a remarkable discovery. They found evidence of primordial gravitational waves imprinted on the cosmic microwave background (CMB), a field of energy pervading the universe.

A confirmation that these waves exist is the validation of a theory called cosmic inflation. It describes the universe’s behaviour less than one-billionth of a second after it was born in the Big Bang, about 14 billion years ago, when it witnessed a brief but tremendous growth spurt. The residual energy of the Bang is the CMB, and the effect of gravitational waves on it is like the sonorous clang of a bell (the CMB) that was struck powerfully by an effect of cosmic inflation. Thanks to the announcement, now we know the bell was struck.

Detecting these waves is difficult. In fact, astrophysicists used to think this day was many more years into the future. If it has come now, we must be thankful to human ingenuity. There is more work to be done, of course, because the results hold only for a small patch of the sky surveyed, and there is also data due from studies done until 2012 on the CMB. Should any disagreement with the recent findings arise, scientists will have to rework their theories.

Remarkable in other ways
The astronomers from the Harvard-Smithsonian used a telescope called BICEP2, situated at the South Pole, to make their observations of the CMB. In turn, BICEP2’s readings of the CMB imply that when cosmic inflation occurred about 14 billion years ago, it happened at a tremendous amount of energy of 1016 GeV (GeV is a unit of energy used in particle physics). Astrophysicists didn’t think it would be so high.

Even the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the world’s most powerful particle accelerator, manages a puny 104 GeV. The words of the physicist Yakov Zel’dovich, “The universe is the poor man’s accelerator”— written in the 1970s — prove timeless.

This energy at which inflation has occurred has drawn the attention of physicists studying various issues because here, finally, is a window that allows humankind to naturally study high-energy physics by observing the cosmos. Such a view holds many possibilities, too, from the trivial to the grand.

For example, consider the four naturally occurring fundamental forces: gravitation, strong and weak-nuclear force, and electromagnetic force. Normally, the strong-nuclear, weak-nuclear and electromagnetic forces act at very different energies and distances.

However, as we traverse higher and higher energies, these forces start to behave differently, as they might have in the early universe. This gives physicists probing the fundamental texture of nature an opportunity to explore the forces’ behaviours by studying astronomical data — such as from BICEP2 — instead of relying solely on particle accelerators like the LHC.

In fact, at energies around 1019 GeV, some physicists think gravity might become unified with the non-gravitational forces. However, this isn’t a well-defined goal of science, and doesn’t command as much consensus as it submits to rich veins of speculation. Theories like quantum gravity operate at this level, finding support from frameworks like string theory and loop quantum gravity.

Another perspective on cosmic inflation opens another window. Even though we now know that gravitational waves were sent rippling through the universe by cosmic inflation, we don’t know what caused them. An answer to this question has to come from high-energy physics — a journey that has taken diverse paths over the years.

Consider this: cosmic inflation is an effect associated with quantum field theory, which accommodates the three non-gravitational forces. Gravitational waves are an effect of the theories of relativity, which explain gravity. Because we may now have proof that the two effects are related, we know that quantum mechanics and relativity are also capable of being combined at a fundamental level. This means a theory unifying all the four forces could exist, although that doesn’t mean we’re on the right track.

At present, the Standard Model of particle physics, a paradigm of quantum field theory, is proving to be a mostly valid theory of particle physics, explaining interactions between various fundamental particles. The questions it does not have answers for could be answered by even more comprehensive theories that can use the Standard Model as a springboard to reach for solutions.

Physicists refer to such springboarders as “new physics”— a set of laws and principles capable of answering questions for which “old physics” has no answers; a set of ideas that can make seamless our understanding of nature at different energies.

Supersymmetry
One leading candidate of new physics is a theory called supersymmetry. It is an extension of the Standard Model, especially at higher energies. Finding symptoms of supersymmetry is one of the goals of the LHC, but in over three years of experimentation it has failed. This isn’t the end of the road, however, because supersymmetry holds much promise to solve certain pressing issues in physics which the Standard Model can’t, such as what dark matter is.

Thus, by finding evidence of cosmic inflation at very high energy, radio-astronomers from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center have twanged at one strand of a complex web connecting multiple theories. The help physicists have received from such astronomers is significant and will only mount as we look deeper into our skies.

vasudevan.m@thehindu.co.in

Copyright© 2014, The Hindu

Albert Einstein's 'spooky' theory may lead to more secure Internet

 

PTI | Melbourne | Updated: Mar 25 2014, 14:50 IST

Physicist Albert Einstein's skepticism about quantum mechanics may lead to ultra-secure Internet, according to a new study. Reuters Physicist Albert Einstein's skepticism about quantum mechanics may lead to ultra-secure Internet, according to a new study. Reuters

Summary:Using the quantum key meant the message was completely secure from interception during transmission.

Physicist Albert Einstein's skepticism about quantum mechanics may lead to ultra-secure Internet, according to a new study.

Researchers from Swinburne University of Technology in Australia and Peking University in China said Einstein's reservations about quantum mechanics were highlighted in a phenomenon known as 'spooky' action at a distance.

In 1935, Einstein and researchers highlighted a 'spooky' theory in quantum mechanics, which is the strange way entangled particles stay connected even when separated by large distances.

"Until now the real application of this has been for messages being shared between two people securely without interception, regardless of the spatial separation between them," said Associate Professor Margaret Reid from Swinburne's Centre for Quantum and Optical Science.

"In this paper, we give theoretical proof that such messages can be shared between more than two people and may provide unprecedented security for a future quantum Internet," Reid said.

In the 1990s, scientists realised you can securely transmit a message through encrypting and using a shared key generated by Einstein's strange entanglement to decode the message from the sender and receiver.

Using the quantum key meant the message was completely secure from interception during transmission.

Sending Einstein's entanglement to a larger number of people means the key can be distributed among all the receiving parties, so they must collaborate to decipher the message, which Reid said makes the message even more secure.

"We found that a secure message can be shared by up to three to four people, opening the possibility to the theory being applicable to secure messages being sent from many to many," Reid said.

"The message will also remain secure if the devices receiving the message have been tampered with, like if an iPhone were hacked, because of the nature of Einstein's spooky entanglement.

"Discovering that it can be applied to a situation with more parties has the potential to create a more secure Internet - with less messages being intercepted from external parties," Reid said.

Friday, 21 March 2014

நியூட்டன், ஆப்பிள், அணுகுண்டு…

Updated: March 20, 2014 09:39 IST

ஆலன் லைட்மேன்

அறிவின் சில பகுதிகள் மனிதர்களுக்கு எட்டாதவை என்றும் கடவுள் எதை வெளிப்படுத்துகிறாரோ அதை மட்டுமே நாம் அறிந்துகொள்ள முடியும் என்றும் பல நூற்றாண்டுகளாக மேற்கத்தியக் கலாச்சாரம் நம்பிவந்தது.

16-ம், 17-ம் நூற்றாண்டுகளில் ஒரு புதிய நம்பிக்கையைத் தோற்றுவிக்கும் வகையில் நிறைய நிகழ்வுகள் நடந்தன. இந்தப் பிரபஞ்சம் முழுவதையும், குறைந்தபட்சம் அதன் பௌதிக பாகங்கள் முழுவதையும் மனிதர்கள் அறிந்துகொள்ள முடியும் என்ற நம்பிக்கைதான் அது. தடை ஏதுமின்றி அறிவைப் பெறுவதற்கான உரிமையின் மீது கொண்ட அந்த நம்பிக்கைதான் கடந்த 1000 ஆண்டுகளில் நடந்த அறிவு வளர்ச்சியில் மிக முக்கியமான நிகழ்வு.

முன்னுதாரணமற்ற புத்தகம்

அந்தப் புதிய நம்பிக்கையின் மகுடம் என்று ஐசக் நியூட்டனின் ‘பிரின்சிபியா’ (1687) புத்தகத்தைக் கூறலாம். இந்தப் பிரம்மாண்டமான அறிவியல் நூல்தான் நிலைமம் (ஒரு பொருள் ஓய்வு நிலையில் அல்லது சீரான இயக்கத்தில் இருக்கும் பண்புதான் நிலைமம்), விசை போன்ற அடிப்படையான கருத்துகளை நிறுவியது, இயக்கத்துக்கான பொது விதிகளைச் சொன்னது, ஈர்ப்புவிசைக்காகச் சிறப்பு விதியை முன்வைத்தது. நியூட்டனின் இந்தப் புத்தகம் அறிவியல் வரலாற்றில் முன்னுதாரணமற்றது.

அதேபோல் நவீன அறிவியலின் பிறப்பிலும் அது முக்கியப் பங்கு வகித்தது. ஈர்ப்புவிசை குறித்து அவர் உருவாக்கிய விதி மகத்தானதுதான். ஆனால், அதைவிட முக்கியமானது என்னவென்றால், எல்லையற்றும் பிரபஞ்ச அளவிலும் அந்த விதியைப் பொருத்திப்பார்க்கக் கூடிய தன்மைதான். மரத்திலிருந்து ஆப்பிளை விழவைத்த அதே ஈர்ப்புவிசைதான் பூமியை நிலவு சுற்றிவருவதற்கும் காரணமாகிறது.

இப்படியாக, பூமிக்கும் பிரபஞ்சத்துக்கும் இடையே கோடு கிழித்து, அரிஸ்டாட்டிலால் பிரித்து வைக்கப்பட்டிருந்த உலகத்துக்கு நியூட்டனின் ‘பிரின்சிபியா' புத்தத்தால் சம்மட்டி அடி விழுந்தது.

பிரபஞ்சம் முழுமைக்கும் பொருந்தும் ஈர்ப்புவிசை என்பது நியூட்டனின் தத்துவம். அந்தத் தத்துவத்தின் ஆழத்தில் மறைந்திருப்பது இதுதான்: ‘இந்தப் பௌதிகப் பிரபஞ்சத்தை மனிதனால் அறிந்துகொள்ள முடியும்.' மனிதப் பிரக்ஞையின் பரிணாமத்தில் இது மிகவும் புதுமையான சிந்தனை. மேலும், புதிய விடுதலை என்றும், மனிதர்களுக்கு அளிக்கப்பட்ட புதிய அதிகாரம் என்றும் இந்தச் சிந்தனையைச் சொல்லலாம்.

இந்தச் சிந்தனை இல்லையென்றால், நமக்கு நியூட்டன் கிடைத்திருக்க மாட்டார். நியூட்டனைத் தொடர்ந்து நிகழ்ந்த அறிவுலக, அறிவியல் சாதனைகளும் சாத்தியமாகியிருக்காது.

அவர் கண்டுபிடித்த விதிகளைவிடவும் மிகமிக முக்கியமான வேறொன்றை நியூட்டன் சாதித்திருப்பதை அவருடைய சமகாலத்தவர்களும் உணர்ந்தார்கள். ‘பிரின்சிபியா' நூலின் இரண்டாம் பதிப்பில் தனது நூலறிமுகத்தில் ரோஜர் கோட்ஸ் என்பவர் இப்படி எழுதுகிறார்: “மனித மனதுக்கு எட்டாதவை என்று முன்பு கருதப்பட்டவற்றையும் எட்டிப்பிடித்த சாதனையை நியூட்டன் நிகழ்த்தியிருக்கிறார்… இப்போது கதவுகள் திறக்கப்பட்டுவிட்டன.”

நவீன அறிவியலின் வரலாறு

நியூட்டனின் ‘பிரின்சிபியா'வில் காணப்படும் புதிய உளவியலை உருவாக்கியது எது? மதச் சிந்தனையில் ஏற்பட்ட மாற்றங்கள் நிச்சயமாக இதில் பங்கு வகித்தன. 1517-ம் ஆண்டு மார்ட்டின் லூதர் கிங்கின் பிரகடனங்கள் புராட்டெஸ்டண்டு பிரிவைத் தோற்றுவித்ததுடன், திருச்சபையின் அதிகாரங்களைக் குறைத்தன. பைபிளை ஒவ்வொரு தனிமனிதரும் படித்துப் புரிந்துகொள்ள முடியும்.

அதற்காக அவர்கள் பாதிரியார்களாக ஆக வேண்டும் என்பதில்லை என்று அவர் சொன்னது புதுவிதமான ஓர் அக விடுதலையை ஊக்குவித்தது. மதரீதியான இந்தச் சுதந்திரம் கலை, இலக்கியம், அறிவியல் போன்ற துறைகளுக்கும் பரவியது.

இதைத் தொடர்ந்து நிறைய அறிவியல் கண்டுபிடிப்புகள் நிகழ்ந்தன. 1572 நவம்பர் 11-ம் தேதியன்று, சூரிய அஸ்தமனத்துக்குப் பிறகு, டிக்கோ ப்ராயே என்ற டேனிஷ் வானியலாளர் காஸ்ஸியபியா நட்சத்திரக் கூட்டத்தில் மிகமிகப் பிரகாசமாக ஒளிரும் ஒரு பொருளைக் கண்டார். அதற்கு முன்னால் அந்தப் பொருளை அங்கே பார்த்ததில்லை என்பதையும் அவர் உணர்ந்தார்.

ப்ராயே கண்டுபிடித்தது வேறொன்றுமில்லை, பெருநட்சத்திர வெடிப்புதான் அது. நட்சத்திரங்களெல்லாம் அழிவற்றவை, மாறாதவை என்ற பழம் நம்பிக்கைகளை ப்ராயேயின் கண்டுபிடிப்பு வெடிக்கச் செய்தது.

பிறகு, விண்ணுலகங்களின் தெய்விகப் பூரணத் தன்மை இத்தாலிய இயற்பியலாளர் கலிலியோவாலும் கேள்விக்குள்ளாக்கப்பட்டது. அவர் தனது புதிய தொலை நோக்கியை 1610-ல் நிலவை நோக்கித் திருப்பினார். “விண்வெளியில் இருக்கும் நிலவு முதலானவை சீராகவும், சமமாகவும், பரிபூரணக் கோளமாகவும் இருக்கும் என்று காலம்காலமாகத் தத்துவஞானிகள் சொல்லிவந்தார்கள்.

ஆனால், அதற்கெல்லாம் நேரெதிராக நிலவு மேடும் பள்ளமுமாக, கரடுமுரடாக, சீரற்ற பரப்பைக் கொண்டிருந்தது” என்கிறார் கலிலியோ.

நியூட்டன் பிறப்பதற்கு முந்தைய சில தசாப்தங்களில் வாழ்ந்த ரெனே தெகார்தேவின் தத்துவங்களும் அப்போது பெரும் செல்வாக்கு செலுத்தின. தன் இருப்பு உள்பட எல்லாவற்றின் இருப்பையும் சந்தேகிக்கக்கூடிய ஒரு தத்துவப் போக்கை முதன்முறையாக தெகார்தே தொடங்கிவைக்கிறார். “நான் சிந்திக்கிறேன். எனவே, நான் இருக்கிறேன்” என்றார் அவர்.

நியூட்டனின் பிரபஞ்சம் தழுவிய இயற்பியல் விதிக்கு முன்வடிவம் போன்ற ஒரு கருதுகோளை தெகார்தே முன்வைத்தார். அதற்கு ‘சுழல்கள்' என்று பெயர். ஆனால், இதை நிரூபிக்க முடியாமல் போனாலும் பூமியிலும் பிரபஞ்ச அளவிலும் நிகழும் எண்ணற்ற நிகழ்வுகளை விளக்கவும் ஒருங் கிணைக்கவும் கூடிய ஒரு துணிவை அவருடைய சித்தாந்தம் தந்தது.

பௌதிகப் பிரபஞ்சத்துக்கும் ஆன்மிகப் பிரபஞ்சத்துக்கும் இடையில் ஒரு வரையறை இருந்தது. மேற்கண்ட முன்னேற்றங்களெல்லாம் அந்த வரையறையை மாற்றியமைத்ததையும் தெளிவுபடுத்தியதையும் நம்மால் உணர முடியும். கொஞ்சம்கொஞ்சமாக, அரிஸ்டாட்டிலின் ‘புனிதப் புவியிய'லின் இடத்தை மேலும் நுட்பமான, அருவமான உலக வரைபடம் ஆக்கிரமித்துக்கொண்டது.

இந்த வரைபடத்தில் பௌதிக உலகம் இருக்கிறது. எலெக்ட்ரான்கள், அணுக்கள், ஒளி, வெப்பம், மூளைகள், நட்சத்திரங்கள், நட்சத்திர மண்டலங்கள் ஆகிய பருப்பொருட்கள்-ஆற்றல்கள் எல்லாம் இந்த வரைபடத்தில் அடக்கம். பரந்துவிரிந்த இந்தப் பிரபஞ்சம் அறிவியல் ஆய்வுகளுக்கும் கணித விதிகளுக்கும் உட்படுத்தக் கூடியதாக இருந்தது.

இந்த பௌதிகப் பிரபஞ்சத்துடன் இணையாக இருப்பது ஆன்மிகரீதியிலான பிரபஞ்சம். இந்தப் பிரபஞ்சம் அளவிட முடியாதது, இடம் சாராதது, அணுக்களாலோ மூலக்கூறுகளாலோ உருவாகாதது.ஆனால், அதில் நம்பிக்கை கொண்டவர்களைப் பொறுத்தவரை எங்கும் நிறைந்திருப்பது அது. இந்த இரண்டு பிரபஞ்சங்களும் எண்ணற்ற, முக்கியமான கேள்விகளை எழுப்புகின்றன.

ஆனாலும், அறிவியலின் களம் என்பது பௌதிகப் பிரபஞ்சம்தானே தவிர, ஆன்மிகப் பிரபஞ்சம் அல்ல. இந்தப் பிரபஞ்சம்குறித்து அறிவியலால் எண்ணற்ற விஷயங்களைச் சொல்ல முடியும். ஆனால், ஆன்மிகப் பிரபஞ்சம்குறித்து அதனால் எதையும் சொல்ல முடியாது. பிரபஞ்சம் தோன்றுவதற்குக் காரணமாக இருந்த ‘பெருவெடிப்பு' (பிக் பேங்) நிகழ்ந்த ஒரு நுண்விநாடிக்கும் (நானோசெகண்ட்) குறைவான கால அளவு வரை எட்டிப்பார்க்க அறிவியலால் முடியும்.

ஆனால், பிரபஞ்சம் ஏன் உருவானது, அதற்கு ஏதாவது நோக்கம் இருக்கிறதா என்ற கேள்விகளுக்கெல்லாம் அறிவியலால் பதில் சொல்ல முடியாது.

அறிவின் சில பகுதிகள் மனிதர்களால் அறிந்து கொள்ள முடியாது என்ற எண்ணம் எல்லா உணர்வுகளை யும்போல நம் ஆழ்மனதில் உறைந்துகிடக்கிறது. அதை நமது பிரக்ஞையிலிருந்து அவ்வளவு எளிதாக வெட்டியெறிந்துவிட முடியாது. மேரி ஷெல்லியின் புகழ்பெற்ற ‘ஃப்ராங்கென்ஸ்டைன்' நாவலில் (1818) இப்படி வரும்: “அறிவைப் பெறுதல் என்பது எவ்வளவு ஆபத்தானது. தனது இயல்பு அனுமதிக்கும் அளவையும் கடந்து மிகப் பெரிய உயரத்தை அடைய நினைப்பவனைவிட, தான் இருக்கும் ஊர்தான் உலகம் என்ற நினைப்பில் வாழும் மனிதன் எவ்வளவு மகிழ்ச்சியானவன்!”

அழிவுக்கான ஆக்கமா?

நியூ மெக்ஸிகோவில் முதல் அணுகுண்டுச் சோதனையை அமெரிக்கா நடத்தியபோது வெளிப்பட்ட பயங்கரம் என்பது, நம் இயல்பைவிட அதீதமான சக்திகளை நாம் கட்டவிழ்த்துவிட்டோம் என்பதற்கான அடையாளமே. இரண்டாம் உலகப் போர் முடிவுக்கு வந்ததும் அணுகுண்டுத் தயாரிப்புத் திட்டத்தின் (மன்ஹாட்டன் புராஜெக்ட்) தலைவரான ராபர்ட் ஓப்பன்ஹீமர், “அப்போது நாங்கள் புரொமிதியஸ் கதையைப் பற்றியும் மனிதனின் புதிய சக்திகள்குறித்த ஆழமான குற்றவுணர்வைப் பற்றியும் நினைத்துக்கொண்டோம்” என்றார்.

படியாக்கத்தின் (குளோனிங்) மூலம் டாலி என்ற ஆட்டை உருவாக்கியபோது, “நவீன வாழ்க்கையின் மதிமயக்கக்கூடிய கதவுகள் திறந்துபார்க்கக் கூடாதவை என்று மூடப்பட்டிருந்தன. அந்தக் கதவுகளைத் திடீரென்று திறந்து, ரகசியங்களை எட்டிப்பார்த்ததுபோல இருக்கிறது” என்று ‘நியூயார்க் டைம்ஸ்' பத்திரிகை எழுதியது.

திறக்கப்படும் ஒவ்வொரு கதவும் தொடர்ந்து நமக்கு உறுத்தலையும் குற்றவுணர்வையும் ஏற்படுத்தக்கூடும். நாம் மிகவும் முன்னேற்றம் அடைந்தவர்களாகவும் ஆதிவாசிகளாகவும் ஒரே நேரத்தில் இருக்கிறோம். நியூட்டனின் சிந்தனைப் பாய்ச்சலும் நாமே, கல்லோடு சேர்த்துக் கட்டப்பட்ட புரொமிதியஸும் நாமே. டி.என்.ஏ-வின் ரகசியங்களைக் கட்டவிழ்த்துவிட்ட வாட்சன்–கிரிக்கும் நாமே, ஆதாம்-ஏவாளும் நாமே.

பல நூற்றாண்டுகளின் விடுதலை உணர்வும் சிறைவாசமும் படைப்புத்திறனும் பயங்கரமும் ஒன்றாக ஒரே வீட்டில் வசிக்கின்றன. திறக்கும் ஒவ்வொரு கதவும் நம்மைத் தொந்தரவுக்குள்ளாக்கும். இருப்பினும், தொடர்ந்து நாம் கதவுகளைத் திறந்துகொண்டிருப்போம்; ஏனெனில், நம்மை யாராலும் எதனாலும் தடுக்கவே முடியாது.

© ‘நியூயார்க் டைம்ஸ்', தமிழில்: ஆசை
(மார்ச் - 20, நியூட்டன் நினைவு நாள்)

ஆப்பிள் ஏன் விழுந்தது? - நியூட்டன் ‘பரபரப்பு’ பேட்டி!

Updated: March 20, 2014 09:44 IST

 

நியூட்டனின் விதிகளை எளிமையாக விளக்கும் வகையில் ஒரு கற்பனை உரையாடல்!

நிருபர்: நியூட்டன் சார், ஆப்பிள் உங்கள் தலையில் விழுந்த கதை உண்மையா?

நியூட்டன்: கெப்ளர் கண்டுபிடித்த கோள்களின் இயக்க விதிகளை மூன்று நாட்களாக விடாமல் படித்துக்கொண்டிருந்தேன். கோள்களெல்லாம் சூரியனை நீள்வட்டமாகச் சுற்றிவருவதுபற்றி அவற்றின் மூலம் அறிந்தேன். அப்போது எனக்குப் பசி தாங்க முடியவில்லை. அந்த வாசிப்பைத் தொடர முடியாததால், ஆப்பிளைப் பறித்துச் சாப்பிட்டுவிட்டு வந்துவிடலாம் என்று தோட்டத்துக்குச் சென்றேன்.

நிருபர்: அப்போதுதான் அந்த ஆப்பிள் உங்கள் தலையில் விழுந்ததா?

நியூட்டன்: இல்லை, அது என் கையில் விழுந்தது.

நிருபர்: உங்களுக்குப் பசி எடுக்கிறது என்று ஆப்பிளுக்கு எப்படித் தெரியும்? அல்லது கடவுள் செயலா?

நியூட்டன்: கடவுள் செயலல்ல, கெப்ளர் செயல்.

நிருபர்: எப்படி?

நியூட்டன்: கோள்களைப் பற்றிய அவரது கண்டுபிடிப்புதான், ஆப்பிள் எப்படி நேராக என் கையில் வந்து விழுந்தது என்பதை எனக்குப் புரிய வைத்தது. கோள்களின் சுற்றுப்பாதை சூரியனை மையம் கொண்டு எப்படி ஒரு நீள்வட்டமாக அமைகிறது என்பதை அவர்தான் புரியவைத்தார்.

நிருபர்: கிரகங்களின் சுழற்சி எல்லோருக்கும் தெரிந்த விஷயம்தானே?

நியூட்டன்: மேலும் அவர் சொன்னது, “சூரியனிலிருந்து ஒரு விசை வெளிவந்து கோளங்களைப் பற்றிக்கொள்கிறது.” அதிலிருந்து நான் சொல்வது, “பூமி தன் புலப்படாத கைகளால் ஆப்பிளைப் பற்றிக்கொள்கிறது.”

நிருபர்: ஆப்பிளைப் பற்றியது உங்கள் கைதானே?

நியூட்டன்: சூரியனிலிருந்து வெளிவரும் விசைபோல் பூமியிலிருந்து ஒரு விசை வெளி வந்து அதைச் சுற்றியுள்ள அனைத்தையும் பற்றிக்கொள்கிறது என்பதைத்தான் நான் அப்படிச் சொன்னேன். கோள்கள், விண்மீன் திரள், ஆப்பிள், நீங்கள், நான் அனைத்தும் அசைவது ஒரு விதியின் கீழ்தான். அதுதான் ‘நியூட்டனின் ஈர்ப்பு விதி’.

நிருபர்: சூரியனைச் சுற்றும் சனி அல்லது புதனைப் போல் ஆப்பிள் ஒன்றும் பூமியைச் சுற்றவில்லையே?

நியூட்டன்: ஆப்பிளால் சுற்ற முடியும்.

நிருபர்: எப்படி?

நியூட்டன்: கொஞ்சம் கற்பனைசெய்து பாருங்கள். மிகமிகப் பலத்துடன், அதாவது பூமியின் ஈர்ப்பு விசையை அது சமாளிக்கக் கூடிய அளவு பலத்துடன் வீசியெறிந்தால் அது பூமியைச் சுற்ற ஆரம்பித்து, தொடர்ந்து சுற்றிக்கொண்டிருக்கும்.

நிருபர்: ஆ… புரிகிறது, பூமியைச் சுற்றும் செயற்கைக்கோள்களைப் போல…

நியூட்டன்: என் கணக்குப்படி ஆப்பிளை ஒரு நொடிக்கு 11 கிலோ மீட்டர் வேகத்தில் வீசினால், பூமியின் ஈர்ப்பு விசையிலிருந்து ஆப்பிள் விடுபட்டுவிடும். அதையே நொடிக்கு 42 கிலோ மீட்டர் வேகத்தில் வீசினால், சூரியனின் ஈர்ப்பு விசையிலிருந்து விடுபட்டு அண்டவெளியில் சுதந்திரமாகப் பயணிக்கத் தொடங்கிவிடும், இன்னொரு கோளின் அல்லது இன்னொரு நட்சத்திரத்தின் ஈர்ப்பு வலையில் விழும்வரை.

நிருபர்: ஆகையால் உங்கள் புகழ்பெற்ற ஈர்ப்பு விதி ஆப்பிளிலிருந்துதான் வந்தது.

நியூட்டன்: ஆமாம். நிறையுள்ள பொருள்கள் எல்லாமே ஒன்றையொன்று ஈர்க்கும் தன்மையுடையன. ஆகையால் மனிதர்கள் நாம் அனைவரும் ஒன்றாக இணையப் படைக்கப்பட்டவர்கள்.

நிருபர்: ஆப்பிளைச் சாப்பிடாமல் ஏன் அதைப் பார்த்தபடியே நிற்கிறீர்கள்?

நியூட்டன்: ஆப்பிளின் சிவப்பு நிறத்தைக் கவனித்தீர்களா?

நிருபர்: அதில் என்ன இருக்கிறது?

நியூட்டன்: சூரியனின் ஒளி ஆப்பிளின் தோல்மீது எதிரொலிப்பதால் ஆப்பிள் நம் கண்களுக்குத் தெரிகிறது.

நிருபர்: இதில் என்ன விஷயம்?

நியூட்டன்: சூரியனின் ஒளி வெண்மையாக இருக்க, அது எப்படி சிவப்பாகப் பிரதிபலிக்கிறது?

நிருபர்: ஆப்பிளின் தோல், ஒளியின் நிறத்தை மாற்றிவிடுகிறது.

நியூட்டன்: இல்லை இல்லை. சில நாள்களுக்கு முன்பு நான் ஒரு ஆராய்ச்சியில் ஈடுபட்டேன். சூரிய ஒளியை ஒரு முப்பட்டகம் (ப்ரிஸம்) வழியே செலுத்தினேன். அது வானவில்லாக வெளிவந்தது.

நிருபர்: ஊதா, கருநீலம், நீலம், பச்சை, மஞ்சள், ஆரஞ்சு, சிவப்பு.

நியூட்டன்: வெண்மை என்பது ஒரு நிறமல்ல, அது அனைத்து நிறங்களின் கூட்டல்.

நிருபர்: ஓ, எல்லா நிறங்களின் தொகுப்பு என்று சொல்லவருகிறீர்களா?

நியூட்டன்: அந்தத் தொகுப்பை முப்பட்டகம் முழுமையாகப் பிரித்துவிடுகிறது. ஆப்பிளோ அனைத்து நிறங்களையும் உள்வாங்கிக்கொண்டு சிவப்பை மட்டும் பிரதிபலிக்கிறது.

நிருபர்: இதைச் சரி என்று எப்படி நிரூபிப்பது?

நியூட்டன்: நீல நிற வெளிச்சத்தில் இந்த ஆப்பிள் உங்கள் கண்களுக்குத் தெரியாது.அது எதையும் பிரதிபலிக்காமல் கருநிறத்தில் தெரியும்.

நிருபர்: அந்த ஆப்பிளைக் கொடுங்கள், நான் பரிசோதித்துப் பார்க்கிறேன்.

நியூட்டன்: ஐயோ, எனது ஆப்பிள்…?

நிருபர்: இயக்கம் குறித்த விதிகளை எனக்குப் புரியும்படி விளக்குங்கள். உங்கள் ஆப்பிளைத் தந்துவிடுகிறேன்.

நியூட்டன்: சரி, சொல்கிறேன். ஒரு பொருளின் அசைவுக்குப் பின்னால் இருக்கும் ரகசியங்களை வெளிப்படுத்துவதுதான் எனது மூன்று இயக்க விதிகள். நீங்கள் ஒரு காரில் 100 கிலோ மீட்டர் வேகத்தில் நேராகச் சென்றுகொண்டிருக்கிறீர்கள் என்று வைத்துக் கொள்வோம். உங்கள் கார் எந்தவொரு மாற்றமுமின்றி நேராகச் செல்லும். அப்படிச் செல்லும் காரின் இயக்கத்தில் மாற்றம் ஏற்பட்டால் என்ன அர்த்தம்?

நிருபர்: காரை ஓட்டும் நான் வேகத்தைக் குறைத்துவிட்டேன் அல்லது கூட்டிவிட்டேன்.

நியூட்டன்: அல்லது…

நிருபர்: ஸ்டீயரிங்கை வலது அல்லது இடது பக்கம் திருப்பிவிட்டேன்.

நியூட்டன்: இதுதான் என் இயக்க விதிகளின் மூலக்கரு. எந்தவொரு பொருளின் இயக்கத்தில் மாற்றம் ஏற்பட்டாலும், அந்தப் பொருளின் மீது ஏதோவொரு விசை செயல்படுகிறது என்று அர்த்தம்.

நிருபர்: ஓ! திடீரென்று ஸ்டீயரிங்கைத் திருப்பியதுபோல்…

நியூட்டன்: ஆம்! இந்தத் திடீர் மாற்றத்தின் விளைவு உங்கள் காரின் வேகத்தில் அல்லது செல்லும் திசையில் தெரியும்.

நிருபர்: வேக மாற்றமும் விசையும் ஒன்றோடு ஒன்று தொடர்புடையது என்பதே நீங்கள் கண்டறிந்த உண்மை. இதை அனைவரும் மிகப் பெரிய சாதனை என்று சொல்கிறார்கள்.

நியூட்டன்: நான் மற்றவர்களுக்கு எப்படித் தோன்றுகிறேன் என்று எனக்குத் தெரியாது. ஆனால், என்னை நான் பார்க்கும்போது கடலோரம் விளையாடும் ஒரு குழந்தையைப் போல் தெரிகிறேன். அந்தக் குழந்தை அதிர்ஷ்டவசமாக ஒரு அழகான கிளிஞ்சலைக் கண்டெடுத்தது. ஆனால், அந்தக் குழந்தையின் முன் பரந்த பெருங்கடலாக அறியப்படாத உண்மைகள் விரிந்துகிடக்கின்றன என்பதுதான் உண்மை.

குறிப்பு:

நியூட்டன் பிறந்தபோது வழக்கத்தில் இருந்தது ஜூலியன் நாட்காட்டி முறை.

இதன்படி நியூட்டனின் பிறப்பு: 25-12-1642, இறப்பு: 20-03-1727.

புதிய நாட்காட்டி முறைப்படி (கிரிகோரியன் நாட்காட்டி) பிறப்பு: 04-01-1643, இறப்பு: 31-03-1727

- குமரன் வளவன், நாடகக் கலைஞர், இயற்பியலாளர்,
பிரெஞ்சு-தமிழ் மொழிபெயர்ப்பாளர்
தொடர்புக்கு: valavane@yahoo.fr

Deep carbon could trigger mass extinction

 

Thursday, 24 July 2003 Richard Ingham
ABC

Earth visualisation

Carbon stored beneath the Earth's crust could be released by volcanic eruptions (NASA)

A vast reservoir of carbon is stashed beneath the Earth's crust and could be released by a major volcanic eruption, unleashing a mass extinction of the kind that last occurred 200 million years ago, German geologists report.

Researchers know that carbon is stored in the mantle, a layer of plastic-like rock beneath Earth's fragile crust, said Professor Hans Keppler of the Institute of Sciences at Germany's University of Tuebingen, whose report appears in today's issue of Nature.

Exactly how much is down there is unknown. Most estimates, drawn from analyses of gases emerging from the mantle, suggest the store is many times more than all the carbon in the Earth's atmosphere, soil and sea combined.

The concern is that if just a part of this gigantic reservoir is quickly released as carbon dioxide, or CO2, that could create a runaway greenhouse effect. The CO2-soaked atmosphere would store up heat from the Sun, shrivelling plant life and destroying species along the food chain.

"The [mantle] reservoir is just gigantic compared with anything that we have on the Earth's surface," said Keppler. So he and his colleagues conducted an ambitious experiment aimed at finding whether mantle rock is a stable storage for CO2.

Most of the rock in the Earth's upper mantle is a crystalline silicate called olivine. In a lab chamber, Keppler's team replicated the fiery heat and intense pressures, of 1,200°C and 3.5 gigapascals, which are likely to exist in the deeper parts of the upper mantle.

They used these conditions to create olivine crystals from raw ingredients of magnesium oxide and silicon dioxide, and exposed them to carbon and water.

The carbon turned out to be almost completely insoluble in olivine: just a tiny amount, between 0.1 and 1.0 parts per million by weight, was absorbed into the rock. So if the carbon is not in the olivine, that leaves only one major source, Keppler said: "If you cannot store the carbon in the olivine, then the only plausible place for storing it are carbonates."

Carbonate rocks have a much lower melting point than olivine, which is able to absorb the punishing furnace-like heat radiating from the Earth's core and still not melt.

Heated to a molten state, carbonates are capable of squeezing through cracks in the olivine, rising up towards the surface and absorbing the free carbon as they go. They can pick up so much that as much as 10 or 20% of their mass is carbon.

The risk, said Keppler, is that this carbonate reservoir could suddenly be breached in the event of a major volcanic eruption.

"Once the carbonate comes up to the surface, as soon as it is below [a pressure of] 20 or 30 kilobars, which corresponds to a depth of 40 or 60 km in the mantle," he said. "As soon as it comes up beyond this depth, it will decompose and release carbon dioxide."

The nightmare scenario? Gigantic geysers of carbon dioxide, imperilling life on the surface. "There has been some evidence that something like this has happened in the past. There is a very good correlation with [CO2] flooding that coincides with several mass extinction events - some massive, sudden change of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere," Keppler said.

One of these events occurred around 245 million years ago, at the end of the Permian era, which saw the largest extinction event in Earth's history: fossil evidence shows as many as 96% of all marine species were lost and more than three quarters of vertebrate, or backboned, species on land.

The other - possibly a cluster of smaller events - was at the end of the Triassic period around 208 million years ago, when around half of the world's species suddenly died out.

That event essentially handed rule of the planet to the dinosaurs, which began a long decline thereafter. They were ultimately consigned to history 65 million years ago by the cataclysmic impact of a 10 km asteroid, which struck what is now the Gulf of Mexico.

Methane eruption blamed for mass extinction

 

Thursday, 4 September 2003

Rossella Lorenzi
Discovery News

methane bubble

Did a massive methane bubble from deep beneath the ocean trigger a mass extinction?

A massive explosion of colourless, odourless natural gas erupting from the ocean depths may have caused the worst mass extinction in the Earth's history some 251 million years ago, according to U.S. geologists.

In the September issue of Geology, Associate Professor Gregory Ryskin of Northwestern University in Illinois contends that an extremely fast, explosive release of dissolved methane gas could have killed 95% of Earth's marine species, and some 70% of land animal and plants at the end of the Permian era - long before dinosaurs lived and died.

According to Ryskin, methane from bacterial decay or from frozen methane hydrates, continuously produced beneath the ocean floor, accumulated to high concentrations in the stagnant and deep prehistoric waters.

Just one disturbance - a small meteorite impact, an earthquake or a seafloor volcano - could have triggered gas-saturated water closer to the surface, where the gas would have bubbled out. The result would have been a catastrophic eruption.

"The erupting region would have 'boiled over', ejecting a large amount of methane and other gases into the atmosphere, and flooding large areas of land," Ryskin said.

He added that the explosive mechanism is the same as Cameroon's Lake Nyos disaster of 1986. That lake erupted, creating a gas-water fountain almost 120 m high and releasing a lethal cloud of carbon dioxide. A water surge washed up the shore to a height of more than 24 m.

More energy than nuclear weapons

The situation would have been much worse in the Permian era, he said. Ryskin calculated that prehistoric oceans could easily have contained enough methane to liberate an energy about 10,000 times greater than the world's entire nuclear weapons stockpile going off at once.

Scientists have long wondered what caused the massive extinction, proposing various possibilities such as an asteroid colliding with Earth, volcanic eruptions in Siberia or an ancient greenhouse effect.

Ryskin's hypothesis lists seven very different pieces of observational evidence, including: the extreme rapidity of marine and terrestrial extinctions, a sharp peak in the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, a drastic negative sulphur and carbon isotope excursion, and the presence in some locations of metallic and glassy superheated debris particles called microspherules.

"There is no final proof for what I am suggesting, but this is the only hypothesis that explains all those pieces of evidence at once," Ryskin said.

Similar, smaller-scale eruptions of methane over time could account for other events and climatic changes, including the Biblical flood, Ryskin added. But most of all, other sluggish seas might still be accumulating methane at their depths, representing a future risk.

"I do think that such eruptions will occur in the future, though perhaps not in the immediate [future], and not on the same scale. I cannot predict the exact time or location. It is very important to start research in oceanography to identify methane deposits," Ryskin said.

Methane has already been identified as a cause for catastrophic disasters in prehistoric times, according to Professor Gerald Dickens of Rice University in Houston.

"But Ryskin's model is different because he invokes methane stored in deep water, rather than from terrestrial systems such as peat deposits or gas hydrates in sediment," Dickens said. "I have not made the mass balance calculations to evaluate his model, but my gut feeling is that there are some problems in the amount of methane that can be stored in deep water."

Giant bubbles could sink ships, say maths experts

News in Science

Friday, 24 October 2003

Anna Salleh
ABC

experiment

An experiment showing a rising bubble about to sink a ship

Methane bubbles from the sea floor could be responsible for the mysterious sinking of ships in areas like the Bermuda Triangle and the North Sea, new Australian research confirms.

Computational mathematics honours student David May and supervisor, Professor Joseph Monaghan of Monash University in Melbourne report their research in the American Journal of Physics.

Their modelling suggests that giant bubbles are much more likely to sink ships than previously thought, adding new weight to warnings about ships travelling in areas where bubbles are likely to be.

Huge bubbles can erupt from undersea deposits of solid methane, known as gas hydrates. The methane - found as an odourless gas in swamps and mines - becomes solid under the enormous pressures at the deep sea floor. Under the sea, however, the ice-like methane deposits can break off and become gaseous as they rise, creating bubbles at the surface.

"Sonar surveys of the ocean floor in the North Sea (between Britain and continental Europe) have revealed large quantities of methane hydrates and eruption sites," say May and Monaghan.

These bubbles aren't any old round sphere, according to May. In fact, they are lens-shaped, with a flat bottom and a domed upper surface.

While previous experimental research - using, for example, bubbles in large glass beakers filled with water - have supported the theory that plumes of bubbles can sink ships, May and Monaghan took these ideas further by simulating the event with a computer model.

But first, they trapped water between vertical glass plates and launched gas bubbles from the bottom to see what would happen to a toy ship floating on the surface. They found that a single giant bubble, the same width as the length of a ship, could swamp a ship under certain circumstances.

The researchers also developed a numerical computer model that was able to predict whether the toy ship would sink under different conditions. The computer model, based on the principles of fluid dynamics, related velocity, pressure, and density measurements of both water and gas, in two dimensions. A display showed the movement of the water resulting from a giant bubble and its impact on a computerised "ship".

May and Monaghan checked the accuracy of the computer model by feeding different sized real bubbles into the glass tank and seeing whether the ship sank as it was placed in different positions in relation to the bubble.

Whether or not the ship will sink depends on its position relative to the bubble. If it is far enough from the bubble, it is safe, they say. If it is exactly above the bubble, it also is safe - the danger position is between the bubble's middle point and the edge of the mound where the trough formed.

"When we started playing around with the model, we saw lots of interesting features at the surface that hadn't been discussed in the literature," May told ABC Science Online.

"I thought the bubble would rise up, burst and create a cavity that the ship would fall into and it wouldn't sink. But instead, you got an elevation of water - a sphere of water that the boat would slide off. But when the bubble burst, you got this high velocity jet of fluid spurting down into the water, pushing the boat under with it."

The researchers say a recent survey has revealed the presence of a sunken vessel within the centre of one particularly large eruption site, now known as the Witches Hole, suspected to be the victim of a bubble.

No one has seen such an eruption in real life, and no one knows how large the bubbles coming off a methane deposit would be or what configuration they would be in. However as soon as bubbles are characterised, measurements can be collected and plugged into the computer model to assess the potential risk to ships passing by, May says.

http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2003/10/24/973492.htm

Bermuda Triangle: New anomalous phenomenon discovered

 

16.09.2011

Bermuda Triangle: New anomalous phenomenon discovered. 45395.jpeg

Recently, American scientists who studied the sea near the famous Bermuda Triangle have found another "anomaly". They saw that the surface waters in this area are literally teeming with a wide variety of viruses. However, the viruses do not represent any danger for humans as they only interested in oceanic bacteria.


The very phrase "Bermuda Triangle" has appeared only recently - it was coined by a fan of Spiritualism and esoteric Vincent Gaddis in 1964. By this toponym he meant an area located between the island of Puerto Rico, the Florida coast and Bermuda. According to the famous mystic of the last century, this area of the Atlantic became notorious due to the fact that hundreds of ships and aircraft disappeared there. Some ships, however, were found later, but without their crews and passengers.

All this made Gaddis suggests that there was some anomaly in this area. However, he was not the first one to express this idea. In 1950 an American journalist Alexander Jones wrote an article about the mysterious disappearance of ships in this region (which he called simply and tastefully - Sea Devil). Yet, the Bermuda Triangle acquired real popularity in 1974, when Charles Berlitz, a popularizer of science, published a book under the same title where he collected descriptions of various mysterious disappearances in the area. The book immediately became a bestseller, and as a result the mysterious and dangerous Sea Devil became known to the entire world. After that different groups of scientists engaged in searching for reasons to explain these disappearances.

Read article: Ten most horrible places on Earth

However, over time the skeptics slowly gained the upper hand over amateur mystics. No anomalies in this part of the ocean were found, and the U.S. Coast Guard has issued several reports according to which the disappearance of ships in the Bermuda Triangle did not occur more frequently than in other regions of the ocean, and they occurred mainly due to storms. Historians, digging in the archives, found that the area since the discovery of America was very often visited by various vessels, including pirate ones. Until the second half of the 20th century sailors made no mention of it as a mysterious place where ships were constantly perishing. Persnickety journalists analyzed Berlitz's book and found that most of the facts presented by the writer were not entirely true, and some were just made up.

By the 1990s, the interest in the Bermuda Triangle was largely exhausted. Recently, however, scientists regained interest in this area, because they did discover one anomaly there. However, it has nothing to do with the disappearance of ships and aircraft.


A team of U.S. scientists led by Professor Craig Carlson of the Bermuda Institute of Oceanology (St. George, Bermuda) have been conducting oceanographic research in the northwestern part of the Sargasso Sea for ten years, near the Bermuda Triangle and Bermuda islands. Recently a report on the work of the biologists has been published. Especially interesting in this report was the fact that, according to the observations of scientists, most numerous living organisms in the surface layers of the ocean in this region are viruses.
Interestingly enough, the dynamics of these microscopic organisms is directly linked with the seasons. For example, in the summer viruses multiply actively in the water layers at depths ranging from 60 to 100 meters, and their number is up to ten million particles per drop of water. In the winter, sometimes they did not exist in the surface layers at all as they would go into the depths, following their masters.

Read article: Lake Bailak devours vessels
The researchers analyzed the DNA of the viruses caught and found that 90 percent of them still were not known to science. However, these microorganisms, both known and unknown, did not present any danger to humans. They all belong to a group of bacteriophages, that is, the objects of their attacks are bacteria living in the ocean. Bacteriophages are known to be very old-fashioned and conservative as they do not change their habits, and do not attack other creatures. 

To be able to reproduce, bacteriophages lie in wait for unsuspecting bacteria. They attach themselves to their cell walls and enter into the victim's DNA. Furthermore, they integrate into the genome of the bacteria (which is a single circular DNA molecule, lying freely in the cytoplasm and not protected by any walls). This makes them forget about their own responsibilities and focus on producing all the necessary molecules for the assembly of new viruses. This assembly also takes place inside the bacterial cell. When the number of newborn bacteriophages reaches several million, they come from the host cell, effectively breaking it into pieces, and then go in search of new victims.

Read article: Most mysterious phenomena of world ocean

The organic molecules of the dead bacteria fill the water surrounding them, and since bacteriophages kill hundreds of thousands of cells, it is not surprising that the sea surface in this place turns into a nutrient broth. Other bacteria hurry there for a feed and quickly become prey of cunning virus. This means that the bacteriophages form a microscopic ecosystem where they live.  

Other marine creatures, unicellular and multicellular planktonic organisms, also enjoy the fruits of their work. Some are attracted by free nutrient broth, and others - by the bacteria feeding on it. It turns out viruses create a "cafeteria" in the surface layers of the sea. Even whales and dolphins come to eat there (these, in turn, are interested in swarms of krill feeding on microplankton and fish eating krill).

Scientists were amazed by what they saw because they did not know about this role of viruses in the formation of oceanic ecosystems. According to many oceanographers, oceanic viruses are very poorly understood because they are hard to catch. But now it is clear that they are countless in all seas and oceans.


"While we cannot see them with the naked eye, viruses are the dominant form of life in the ocean. They constitute 95 percent of the total biomass of the ocean. That is, the mass of virus is even larger than the mass of krill, fish and larger animals such as whales, combined. Given the pace of virus multiplication and their number, it becomes apparent how important their role in nutrient cycling on the planet is," said one of the authors of the study of biological "anomalies" of the Bermuda Triangle Dr. Rachel Persons.
However, some experts believe that in this case there are no abnormalities specific to the Bermuda triangle as processes involving the viruses are occurring in many areas of the oceans. For example, biologists from the U.S. and Canada investigated the surface waters of the North Atlantic and reported that the most diverse viral community (129,000 genotypes) was found off the coast of British Columbia. The number of these microorganisms is also very high - approximately 50 million particles in a drop of water, which is five times greater than in the Bermuda Triangle. This "virus rage" is explained by the fact that this area has rising sea currents (upwelling), bringing nutrients from the depths of the ocean to the surface. In such areas sentient beings are more abundant and their diversity is higher than in the surrounding areas, and the virus is no exception to this rule.

It appears that the largest "virus carrier" on the planet is exactly in the oceans. It is fortunate that most of microscopic parasites living in it are not dangerous to humans.


Anton Evseev

Pravda.Ru

Bermuda Triangle

News in Science

Is it any easier to get lost at sea in the notorius Bermuda Triangle than anywhere else on then planet? Dr Karl doesn't think so...

By Karl S. Kruszelnicki

Black Sea

When you compare it to the rest of the world, the Bermuda Triangle is big enough, but its reputation is enormous. Geographically speaking, it runs between the Bermuda Islands, Puerto Rico and Miami in Florida. But the myth of the vanishings associated with the Bermuda Triangle is so powerful that books, TV documentaries and even movies have been made about it.

The seeds of the myth began at 2.10 PM, on 5th December, 1945, when a flight of 5 Avenger Torpedo Bombers lifted off from the Naval Base airstrip at Fort Lauderdale in Florida, on a routine bombing training run. The story then goes that in perfectly clear weather, these experienced aviators became mysteriously disorientated, and in a series of increasingly panicked radio transmissions, asked for help. The last radio transmission from Flight 19 was at 7.04 PM. By 7.20 PM a Martin Mariner rescue plane was dispatched - and it too vanished without a trace. By the way, the missing pilots and their missing planes made a brief appearance in the movie, Close Encounters of the Third Kind, where it was implied that they had been abducted by aliens.

But the myth claims that it's not just planes that vanish there. Many ships apparently came to foul ends in the Bermuda Triangle, including the 19th century sailing ship, the Marie Celeste, which was supposedly found drifting and abandoned, in perfect sailing condition. And the Bermuda Triangle has moved with the times, and since then, many more ships, including the nuclear submarine USS Scorpion, have vanished there without a trace.

The real story is more prosaic.

First, the Bermuda Triangle is huge - over one million square kilometres, or one fifth the area of Australia ( the contiguous continental USA).

Second, it's just north of the birthplace of most of the Atlantic hurricanes that lash the east coast of the USA. The Gulf Stream, that "river in a sea", flows swiftly and turbulently through the Bermuda Triangle, dumping huge amounts of energy there. Many wild storms can suddenly burst into existence, and can, just as suddenly, fade away.

Third, the undersea landscape is incredibly varied, ranging from shallow continental shelf to the deepest depths of the Atlantic, about 30,000 feet deep. This means that some wrecks would be very difficult to find.

Fourth, it's one of the heaviest-travelled pleasure craft routes in the world, so you would expect to find many nautical mishaps there.

Fifth, a survey by Lloyds of London shows that, on a percentage basis, there are no more ships lost in the Bermuda Triangle, than anywhere else in the world.

When you look at the stories more closely, the myth unravels even more.

The Marie Celeste was found abandoned on the other side of the Atlantic, between Portugal and the Azores. Contrary to legend, its sails were in very poor condition, and it was listing badly - definitely not in near perfect condition. The USS Scorpion was found, sunk, near the Azores, again, a long way from the Bermuda Triangle.

The story of Flight 19 on December 5, 1945, is the key.

The naval aviators were not experienced. They were all trainees, apart from the Commander, a Lt. Charles Taylor. Reports say that he was suffering from a hangover, and tried unsuccessfully to get another commander to fly this mission for him. The weather was not clear - rather, a sudden storm raised 15-metre waves. The Avenger Torpedo Bombers simply ran out of fuel and sank in the storm, after dark, and in high seas. One of Commander Taylor's colleagues wrote, "...they didn't call those planes 'Iron Birds' for nothing. They weighed 14,000 pounds (over 6 tonnes) empty. So when they ditched, they went down pretty fast."

The Martin Mariner rescue plane sent to look for the Avengers did not vanish without trace. These rescue planes were flying fuel tanks, because they had to remain aloft for 24 hours continuously. And prior to this incident, they had a reputation for leaking petrol fumes inside the cabin. The crew of the SS Gaines Mill actually saw this Mariner breaking up in an explosion about 23 seconds after take-off, and saw debris floating in the stormy seas. After this Mariner exploded, the Navy grounded the entire fleet of Mariners.

The myth of the malevolent supernatural powers hiding in the Bermuda Triangle began when Vincent H. Gaddis wrote rather creatively about Flight 19 in the February 1964 issue of Argosy : Magazine of Masterpiece Fiction in a story called, The Spreading Mystery of the Bermuda Triangle. But it really took off in 1974, when Charles Berlitz released his best-seller The Bermuda Triangle, an even more imaginative account.

Exotic explanations for these disasters include power crystals from Atlantis, hostile aliens hiding under the waters, violent vortices from other dimensions, and evil humans using anti-gravity machines.

But it turns out that there is something mysterious, and potentially dangerous, and potentially very useful, under the ocean floor of the Bermuda Triangle, and I'll talk about that, next time...

Published 12 March 2004

 

Bermuda Triangle II

Last time I talked about the myth of the Bermuda Triangle, that triangle of ocean between Bermuda, Puerto Rico and Miami, where ships supposedly vanish for no good reason. But when you look at the statistics, the sinkings are on a par with any other similarly-trafficked area of ocean real estate anywhere else on the planet. The extra sinkings are not real. But there is something very strange lurking under the floor of the Bermuda Triangle - an ice that burns.

In fact, this bizarre ice exists in many other places around the world as well. It's called a "methane hydrate". Basically, it's a single molecule of methane trapped in a cage of six water molecules. Methane has the chemical formula of CH4, which means one atom of carbon is surrounded by four atoms of hydrogen, while water is your standard H2O. If you have methane and water together in the same place, and if the pressure is high enough and the temperature is low enough, you can get a methane hydrate. If you bring a lump of methane hydrate to the surface, the icy water melts releasing the methane, which will burn quite nicely. In one sense, these methane hydrates are kind of like vampires - they will fall to pieces if you bring them out into the light.

These hydrates have been a scientific curiosity for about two centuries. It was only in the late 1960s that Russian scientists discovered natural hydrates in the freezing Siberian permafrost. In the 1970s methane hydrates were discovered at the bottom of The Black Sea. The Black Sea is loaded with these methane hydrates. In fact, sailors have long reported seeing bolts of lightning set fire to the methane on the surface of the sea - methane that had spontaneously bubbled up from below the ocean floor. And since then, they've been found in many many places under the ocean floor, including the notorious Bermuda Triangle.

In fact, there's a huge amount of methane down there. For example, about 330 kilometres off the coast of North Carolina, and three kilometers below the surface of the ocean, is a uprising on the ocean floor called Blake Ridge. This Blake Ridge covers around 100,000 square kilometres of the ocean floor. One quarter of it, just 25,000 square kilometers, holds methane equivalent to around 35 billion tonnes of carbon. In plain English, that deposit of methane would be enough to cover the entire natural gas consumption of the USA for a hundred years. And yet this is just one small area of methane hydrates.

Where did all this methane come from? The answer starts with all the dead bodies of various sea creatures floating down to form a mud on the ocean floor. Strange creatures like bacteria called Archaea, live down there, and eat these dead bodies. If you think that ice-that-burns is weird, these Archaea are even weirder.

Back in the old days, about a quarter-of-a-century ago, the biologists divided life into Five Kingdoms - plants, animals, fungi, protists (single-celled creatures with separate nuclei) and bacteria (single-celled creatures without separate nuclei). But in the late 1970s, Dr. Carl Woese and his colleagues from the University of Illinois started looking at these creatures from the point-of-view of their DNA. They found that some bacteria didn't really belong neatly with the other bacteria. They were small, like regular bacteria, but they had major differences in the DNA, in their cell membranes, and in a whole lot of other areas. These weird bacteria-like creatures often lived in extreme conditions where bacteria could not - temperatures over 100oC, extreme pressure or extreme saltiness. They called these weird bacteria, Archaebacteria, which they later shortened to Archaea. After a while, these scientists realized that all living creatures could be separated into three Domains - the bacteria, the Archaea, and everything else.

It seems that some of these Archaea have been around since the very first days of life on our planet, about 3.8 billion years ago, long before there was any oxygen in the atmosphere.

Some of these Archaea make methane, while others eat it, and sometimes, there's enough methane left over to form these methane hydrates. If these little methane eaters didn't exist, there'd be an extra 300 million tonnes of methane each year bubbling up from the ocean floor. Methane is a very powerful greenhouse gas, about 20 times more powerful than carbon dioxide, and that would set off some pretty significant warming on our little planet. So we're lucky that these methane producers live next to methane eaters.

There seems to be a lot of them around. Some scientists have calculated that the primitive Archaea and other bacteria-like creatures living on the ocean floor make up one third of all the biomass of living creatures on our planet. So in about quarter-of-a-century, these Archaea have gone from completely unknown, to making up one third of the biomass on the planet!

Now sure, a bit of methane bubbling up to the surface can burn in a pretty way if it's hit by lightning - but it can be a lot more dangerous than that, and I'll talk about that, next time...

Published 01 November 2005

© 2014 Karl S. Kruszelnicki Pty Ltd

Bermuda Triangle 3

This episode of GMIS concludes Karl's wee (but mighty!) series on ye murky deep and dangers that lurk there! Drag at your peril...

By Karl S. Kruszelnicki

Or The Ice That Burns

Last time I talked about bizarre creatures, that were not even discovered a quarter-of-a-century ago, and that make up about one third of all the biomass on the planet. Some of them live in the mud on the ocean floor. These creatures, which look like bacteria, but which are as different from bacteria as we humans are, date back to the ancient time, before there was any oxygen on the planet. They live in a methane-rich environment on the ocean floor, and they both make and eat methane. They even release the methane gas, which then burps its way up to the surface - and when it gets there, this methane gas can be quite dangerous.

Sure, a bit of methane bubbling up to the surface can burn prettily if it's hit by lightning.

But methane in water can be much more dangerous than that. Ships float nicely in water, but if you try to make them float in a mix of water and bubbles, they sink like a set of car keys. There's an area of the ocean called Witch Ground, about 150 kilometres north east of Aberdeen in Scotland. We know that methane bubbles up from time to time, leaving pock marks in the ocean floor. Witchs Hole is a large pock mark on the ocean floor, in Witch's Ground, about 100 metres across. And recently, a trawler has been discovered sitting underwater, perfectly upright, in the middle of this small 100-metre wide methane production hole (or pockmark). It's a steel-built vessel around 25 metres long, built somewhen between 1890 and 1930. We're guessing, but if a large burst of methane bubbles rose up, the trawler would lose all flotation, and just sink, perfectly level, until it bottomed out on the ocean floor.

And if some really large bubbles of methane gas were to rise in the atmosphere and then get sucked into the engines of a jet, they could make a nasty explosion.

This Methane Bubbling Effect, which happens in the Bermuda Triangle, could also explain some of the strange disappearances.

But the Disaster Scenarios get even more extreme than that. Some scientists reckon that about 55.5 million years ago, about one trillion tonnes of methane bubbled to the surface over a very short period, about 1,000 years (that's about 30 tonnes per second), and heated up the planet by about 2°C. Other scientists agree, but crank up the drama by suggesting that a lot of this methane burnt in massive firestorms. Regardless of how extreme this was, it goes under the official name of the Late Paleocene Thermal Maximum.

These deposits of methane hydrates are not cold chunks of ice, making up lifeless deserts, on the ocean floor. Recently, worms around two to five centimeters long have been discovered living happily in the methane hydrates. These pastel pink creepers are flat, segmented worms, with two rows of bristly feet on each side, like oars, which let them move through the canary yellow frozen ice.

These methane hydrates are now the largest untapped source of fossil fuels left here on Earth. But there are a few problems with using them as fuel. First, remember that methane has the chemical formula of CH4 - that's four hydrogen atoms surrounding one carbon atom. When you burn carbon, you get carbon dioxide, and off goes the Greenhouse Effect again. Second, you use up such a huge source of energy without having some flow-on effects, somewhere else in the environment. What they will be, we have no idea.

The methane hydrates stay as solid inert frozen lumps, because of the weight of the ocean above them. But anytime there's an ice age, the ocean height drops by roughly 100 metres. This might then release the pressure on some of the methane hydrates and let the methane bubble to the surface. This would set off a Mini Greenhouse Effect, which would then help reverse the ice age - yet another case of the Earth bringing itself back to its original state, through a negative feedback loop.

At the moment, we're roughly half way through all the easily available and commercially extractable oil. Perhaps these methane hydrates, which are estimated to hold twice as much carbon as all the other fossil energy sources put together, will be the fuel of the 21st Century. Or perhaps we'll be able to do something more sensible than just burn them, and instead, extract the hydrogen to use in fuel cells.

Or maybe a more sensible thing would be to look at the genetic code of these strange methane-producing creatures. They could give us new drugs, or teach us new ways to modify existing chemicals. One thing is certain, this exotic frozen ice, and other secrets of the deep, will have a big influence in the 21st century.

Published 11 November 2005

Wednesday, 19 March 2014

What are gravitational waves?

March 18, 2014

Updated: March 18, 2014 15:09 IST

Gravitational waves are ripples that carry energy across the universe. They were predicted to exist by Albert Einstein in 1916 as a consequence of his General Theory of Relativity. Although there is strong circumstantial evidence for their existence, gravitational waves have not been directly detected before. This is because they are minuscule — a million times smaller than an atom. They are like tiny waves on a lake — from far away, the lake’s surface looks glassy smooth; only up very close can the details of the surface be seen.

Particularly exciting are “primordial” gravitational waves, which were generated in the first moments of the universe’s birth. These carry vital information about how the universe began.

What is general relativity?

In 1916, Albert Einstein discovered a mathematical way to explain gravity. He called it his general theory of relativity. It relied on a set of coordinates that described space and time together, known as the space-time continuum.

Matter and energy warp the space-time continuum like heavy weight on a mattress. The warping creates the force of gravity. Gravitational waves are ripples in the space-time continuum (instead of an ordinary mattress, think of a waterbed).

It isn’t all esoteric mathematics. General relativity tells us how gravity affects time, which must be taken into account by your satnav to tell you accurately where you are.

What is the significance of this discovery?

If scientists at Harvard University have detected gravitational waves, it is significant for two reasons. First, this opens up a whole new way of studying the Universe, allowing scientists to infer the processes at work that produced the waves. Second, it proves a hypothesis called inflation. This can be used to give us information about the origin of the universe, known as the big bang.

How can gravitational waves be detected?

A telescope at the south pole, called Bicep (Background Imaging of cosmic Extragalactic Polarisation), has been searching for evidence of gravitational waves by detecting a subtle property of the cosmic microwave background radiation. This radiation was produced in the big bang. It was originally discovered by American scientists in 1964 using a radio telescope and has been called the “echo” of the big bang. Bicep has measured the large-scale polarisation of this microwave radiation. Only primordial gravitational waves can imprint such a pattern, and only then if they have been amplified by inflation.

What is inflation?

The big bang was originally hypothesised by Belgian priest and physicist Georges Lemaitre. He called it “the day without yesterday” because it was the moment when time and space began.

But the big bang does not fit all astronomers’ observations. The distribution of matter across space is too uniform to have come from the big bang as originally conceived. So in the 1970s, cosmologists postulated a sudden enlargement of the universe, called inflation, that occurred in the first minuscule fraction of a second after the big bang. But confirming the idea has proved difficult. Only inflation can amplify the primordial gravitational wave signal enough to make it detectable. If primordial gravitational waves have been seen, it means that inflation must have taken place.

What next? Do cosmologists just pack up and go home?

No way. Now the work really begins. Einstein knew that general relativity did not mesh with another theory of physics called quantum mechanics. Whereas general relativity talks about gravity and the universe as a whole, quantum mechanics talks about the small scale of particles and the other forces of nature, the strong and weak nuclear forces, and electromagnetism. Despite almost a century of effort, the world’s physicists have not been able to show how these theories work together. The primordial gravitational waves were generated when gravity and the universe were working on the same scale as particles and the other forces of nature. This detection and the subsequent analysis will hopefully tell us how. If it does, this could lead to what physics wistfully call “the theory of everything”. © Guardian News & Media 2014

Climate change might have helped humans replace Neanderthals

Berlin, March 18, 2014

Updated: March 18, 2014 16:46 IST

PTI

Jan. 8, 2003 file photo, a reconstructed Neanderthal skeleton, right, and a modern human version of a skeleton are on display at the Museum of Natural History in New York.

AP Jan. 8, 2003 file photo, a reconstructed Neanderthal skeleton, right, and a modern human version of a skeleton are on display at the Museum of Natural History in New York.

A drier climate might have helped anatomically modern humans replace Neanderthals around 40,000 years ago, scientists have found.

Why humans replaced Neanderthals has been the subject of a long-running debate. A popular hypothesis suggests that a broader dietary spectrum of modern humans gave them a competitive advantage on Neanderthals.

Geochemical analyses of fossil bones seemed to confirm this dietary difference.

Indeed, higher amounts of nitrogen heavy isotopes were found in the bones of modern humans compared to those of Neanderthals, suggesting at first that modern humans included fish in their diet while Neanderthals were focused on the meat of terrestrial large game, such as mammoth and bison.

However, these studies did not look at possible isotopic variation of nitrogen isotopes in the food resource themselves, according to a new research published in the Journal of Human Evolution.

In fact, environmental factors such as aridity can increase the heavy nitrogen isotope amount in plants, leading to higher nitrogen isotopic values in herbivores and their predators even without a change of subsistence strategy.

The new study by researchers from the University of Tubingen (Germany) and the Musee national de Prehistoire in Les Eyzies-de-Tayac (France) revealed that the nitrogen isotopic content of animal bones, both herbivores, such as reindeer, red deer, horse and bison, and carnivores such as wolves, changed dramatically at the time of first occurrence of modern humans in south-western France.

The changes are very similar to those seen in human fossils during the same period, showing that there was not necessarily a change in diet between Neanderthals and modern humans, but rather a change in environment that was responsible for a different isotopic signature of the same food resources.

Moreover, this isotopic event coinciding in timing with the replacement of Neanderthals by modern humans may indicate that environmental changes, such as an increase of aridity, could have helped modern humans to overcome the Neanderthals.

These new results, together with recently published research showing that Neanderthals had more skills and exploited more diverse food resources than previously thought, makes the biological differences between these two types of prehistoric humans always smaller, researchers said.

In this context, the exact circumstances of the extinction of Neanderthals by modern humans remain unclear and they are probably more complex than just a behavioural superiority of one type of humans compared to the other, they said.

Tuesday, 18 March 2014

Planck satellite: Maps detail Universe's ancient light

21 March 2013 Last updated at 10:00 GMT

Jonathan Amos

By Jonathan Amos Science correspondent, BBC News, Paris

A map tracing the "oldest light" in the sky has been produced by Europe's Planck Surveyor satellite. Its pattern confirms the Big Bang theory for the origin of the Universe but subtle, unexpected details will require scientists to adjust some of their ideas.

image

The map shows tiny deviations from the average background temperature, where blue is slightly cooler and red is slightly warmer. The cold spots are where matter was more concentrated and later collapsed under gravity to form stars and galaxies. Image: ESA/Planck Collaboration

A spectacular new map of the "oldest light" in the sky has just been released by the European Space Agency.

Scientists say its mottled pattern is an exquisite confirmation of our Big-Bang model for the origin and evolution of the Universe.

But there are features in the picture, they add, that are unexpected and will require ideas to be refined.

The map was assembled from 15 months' worth of data acquired by the 600m-euro (£515m) Planck space telescope.

It details what is known as the cosmic microwave background, or CMB - a faint glow of long wavelength radiation that pervades all of space.

Its precise configuration, visible in the new Planck data, is suggestive of a cosmos that is slightly older than previously thought - one that came into existence 13.82 billion years ago.

This is an increase of about 50 million years on earlier calculations.

The map's pattern also indicates a subtle adjustment is needed to the Universe's inventory of contents.

It seems there is slightly more matter out there (31.7%) and slightly less "dark energy" (68.3%), the mysterious component thought to be driving the cosmos apart at an accelerating rate.

"I would imagine for [most people] it might look like a dirty rugby ball or a piece of modern art," said Cambridge University's George Efstathiou, presenting the new picture here at Esa headquarters in Paris.

"But I can assure you there are cosmologists who would have hacked our computers or maybe even given up their children to get hold of this map, we're so excited by it."

Planck is the third western satellite to study the CMB. The two previous efforts - COBE and WMAP - were led by the US space agency (Nasa). The Soviets also had an experiment in space in the 1980s that they called Relikt-1.

The CMB is the light that was finally allowed to spread out across space once the Universe had cooled sufficiently to permit the formation of hydrogen atoms - about 380,000 years into the life of the cosmos.

It still bathes the Earth in a near-uniform glow at microwave frequencies, and has a temperature profile that is just 2.7 degrees above absolute zero.

But it is possible to detect minute deviations in this signal, and these fluctuations - seen as mottling in the map - are understood to reflect the differences in the density of matter when the light parted company and set out on its journey all those years ago.

The fluctuations can be thought of as the seeds for all the structure that later developed in the cosmos - all the stars and galaxies.

Scientists subject the temperature deviations to a range of statistical analyses, which can then be matched against theoretical expectations.

This allows them to rule in some models to explain the origin and evolution of the cosmos, while ruling out a host of others.

The team that has done this for Planck's data says the map is an elegant fit for the standard model of cosmology - the idea that the Universe started in a hot, dense state in an incredibly small space, and then expanded and cooled.

At a fundamental level, it also supports an "add-on" to this Big Bang theory known as inflation, which postulates that in the very first moments of its existence the Universe opened up in an exponential manner - faster than light itself.

But because Planck's map is so much more detailed than anything previously obtained, it is also possible to see some anomalies in it.

Temperature anomalies in Planck data Planck has confirmed the north/south differences and a "cold spot" in the data

One is the finding that the temperature fluctuations, when viewed across the biggest scales, do not match those predicted by the standard model. Their signal is a bit weaker than expected.

There appears also to be an asymmetry in the average temperatures across the sky; the southern hemisphere is slightly warmer than the north.

A third anomaly is a cold spot in the map, centred on the constellation Eridanus, which is much bigger than would be predicted.

These features have been hinted at before by Planck's most recent predecessor - Nasa's WMAP satellite - but are now seen with greater clarity and their significance cemented.

A consequence will be the binning of many ideas for how inflation propagated, as the process was first introduced in the 1980s as a way to iron out such phenomena.

The fact that these delicate features are real will force theorists to finesse their inflationary solutions and possibly even lead them to some novel physics on the way.

"Inflation doesn't predict that it should leave behind any kind of history or remnant, and yet that's what we see," Planck project scientist Dr Jan Tauber told BBC News.

 

How Planck's view hints at new physics

Planck anomalies graphic

  • The CMB's temperature fluctuations are put through a number of statistical analyses
  • Deviations can be studied as a function of their size on the sky - their angular scale
  • When compared to best-fit Big Bang models, some anomalies are evident
  • One shows the fluctuations on the biggest scales to be weaker than expected
  • Theorists will need to adjust their ideas to account for these features

Planck's new numbers

    • 4.9% normal matter - atoms, the stuff from which we are all made
    • 26.8% dark matter - the unseen material holding galaxies together
    • 68.3% dark energy - the mysterious component accelerating cosmic expansion
    • The number for dark energy is lower than previously estimated
    • The new age - 13.82 billion years - results from a slower expansion
    • This is described by a value known as the Hubble Constant
    • It too is revised to 67.15 km per second, per megaparsec (3.2 million light-years)

CMB - The 'oldest light' in the Universe

Detail of CMB data

  • Theory says 380,000 years after the Big Bang, matter and light "decoupled"
  • Matter went on to form stars and galaxies; the light spread out and cooled
  • The light - the CMB - now washes over the Earth at microwave frequencies
  • Tiny deviations from this average glow appear as mottling in the map (above)
  • These fluctuations reflect density differences in the early distribution of matter
  • Their pattern betrays the age, shape and contents of the Universe, and more

Edwin Powell Hubble - The man who discovered the cosmos

 

Edwin Powell Hubble

Edwin Powell Hubble

"I knew that even if I were second or third rate, it was astronomy that mattered."

This sentence, written by Edwin Hubble recalling his youth, tells us a lot about this stubborn, ambitious, sometimes even snobbish and arrogant young man. A man who eventually broke the promise made to his father and followed the path dictated by his passion.

As a result of Hubble's work, our perception of mankind's place in the Universe has changed forever: humans have once again been set aside from the centre of the Universe. When scientists decided to name the Space Telescope after the founder of modern cosmology the choice could not have been more appropriate.

A promising student

Edwin Hubble was born in Missouri in 1889, the son of an insurance executive, and moved to Chicago nine years later. At his high school graduation in 1906, the principal said: "Edwin Hubble, I have watched you for four years and I have never seen you study for ten minutes." He paused, leaving young Edwin on tenterhooks a moment longer, before continuing: "Here is a scholarship for the University of Chicago."

This high school scholarship was also awarded to another student by mistake, so the money had to be halved and Edwin had to supply the rest. He paid his expenses by tutoring, working in the summer and, in his junior year, by obtaining a scholarship in physics and working as a laboratory assistant. He finally obtained a degree in Mathematics and Astronomy in 1910.

The Rhodes scholar

A tall, powerfully built young man, Hubble loved basketball and boxing, and the combination of athletic prowess and academic ability earned him a Rhodes scholarship to Oxford. There, a promise made to his dying father, who never accepted Edwin's infatuation for astronomy, led him to study law rather than science, although he also took up Literature and Spanish.

He studied Roman and English Law at Oxford and returned to the United States only in 1913. Here he passed the bar examination and practised law half-heartedly for a year in Kentucky, where his family was then living.

The beloved high school teacher and coach

He was also hired by New Albany High School (New Albany, Indiana) in the autumn of 1913 to teach Spanish, Physics and Mathematics, and to coach basketball. His popularity as a teacher is recorded in the school yearbook dedicated to him: "To our beloved teacher of Spanish and Physics, who has been a loyal friend to us in our senior year, ever willing to cheer and help us both in school and on the field, we, the class of 1914, lovingly dedicate this book."

When the school term ended in May 1914, Hubble decided to pursue his first passion and so returned to university as a graduate student to study more astronomy.

A new era for astronomy begins

The famous British astrophysicist Stephen Hawking wrote in his book A Brief History of Time that Hubble's "discovery that the Universe is expanding was one of the great intellectual revolutions of the 20th century." Who could have guessed such a future for Edwin when he began his PhD in Astronomy at Chicago University in 1914?

War postpones Hubble's astronomical debut

Early in 1917, while still finishing the work for his doctorate, Hubble was invited by George Ellery Hale, founder of the Mount Wilson Observatory, in Pasadena, California, to join the staff there. This was a great opportunity, but it came in April of a dreadful year. After sitting up all night to finish his PhD thesis and taking the oral examination the next morning, Hubble enlisted in the infantry and telegraphed Hale:"Regret cannot accept your invitation. Am off to the war."

He served in France and next returned to the United States in 1919. He went immediately to the Mount Wilson Observatory, where the newly discharged Major Hubble, as he invariably introduced himself, arrived, still in uniform, but ready to start observing.

Hubble was lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time. Mount Wilson was the centre of observational work underpinning the new astrophysics, later called cosmology, and the 100-inch Hooker Telescope, then the most powerful on Earth, had just been completed and installed after nearly a decade of work.

On the mountain Hubble encountered his greatest scientific rival, Harlow Shapley, who had already made his reputation by measuring the size of the Milky Way, our own Galaxy. Shapley had used a method pioneered by Henrietta Leavitt at the Harvard College Observatory that relied on the behaviour of standardised light variations from bright stars called Cepheid variables to establish the distance of an object.

His result of 300 000 light-years for the width of the galaxy was roughly 10 times the previously accepted value. However Shapley, like most astronomers of the time, still thought that the Milky Way was all there was to the Universe. Despite a suggestion first made by William Herschel in the 18th century, he shared the accepted view that all nebulae were relatively nearby objects and merely patches of dust and gas in the sky.

The turning point

Hubble had to spend many bitterly cold nights sitting at the powerful Hooker telescope before he could prove Shapley wrong. In October 1923 he spotted what he first thought was a nova star flaring up dramatically in the M31 "nebula" in the constellation of Andromeda. After careful examination of photographic plates of the same area taken previously by other astronomers, including Shapley, he realised that it was a Cepheid star. Hubble used Shapley's method to measure the distance to the new Cepheid. He could then place M31 a million light-years away - far outside the Milky Way and thus itself a galaxy containing millions of stars. The known Universe had expanded dramatically that day and - in a sense - the Cosmos itself had been discovered!

Even The New York Times of the day realised the importance of the discovery: "Finds spiral nebulae are stellar systems. Doctor Hubbel [sic] confirms view that they are 'island universes' similar to our own."

Just the beginning

This discovery was of great importance to the astronomical world, but Hubble's greatest moment was yet to come. He began to classify all the known nebulae and to measure their velocities from the spectra of their emitted light. In 1929 he made another startling find - all galaxies seemed to be receding from us with velocities that increased in proportion to their distance from us - a relationship now known as Hubble's Law.

This discovery was a tremendous breakthrough for the astronomy of that time as it overturned the conventional view of a static Universe and showed that the Universe itself was expanding. More than a decade earlier, Einstein himself had bowed to the observational wisdom of the day and corrected his equations, which had originally predicted an expanding Universe. Now Hubble had demonstrated that Einstein was right in the first place.

The now elderly, world-famous physicist went specially to visit Hubble at Mount Wilson to express his gratitude. He called the original change of his beloved equations "the greatest blunder of my life."

Another war stops Hubble again

Hubble worked on indefatigably at Mount Wilson until the summer of 1942, when he left to serve in World War II. He was awarded the Medal of Merit in 1946. Finally, he went back to his Observatory. His last great contribution to astronomy was a central role in the design and construction of the Hale 200-inch Telescope on Palomar Mountain. Four times as powerful as the Hooker, the Hale would be the largest telescope on Earth for decades. In 1949, he was honoured by being allowed the first use of the telescope.

No Nobel Prize for an astronomer

During his life, Hubble had tried to obtain the Nobel Prize, even hiring a publicity agent to promote his cause in the late 1940s, but all the effort was in vain as there was no category for astronomy. Hubble died in 1953 while preparing for several nights of observations, his last great ambition unfulfilled.

He would have been thrilled had he known that the Space Telescope is named after him, so that astronomers can continue to "hope to find something we had not expected", as he said in 1948 during a BBC broadcast in London.

http://www.spacetelescope.org/about/history/the_man_behind_the_name/

Inflation: A compact guide to big science

17 March 2014 Last updated at 14:47

By Jonathan Amos Science correspondent, BBC News

South Pole Telescope facility Scientists working at the South Pole have been looking in the sky for an indelible mark left by inflation

Scientists claim to have found the most compelling evidence yet that the Universe went through a faster-than-light expansion in its first moments.

line break

Can we start at the beginning - the Big Bang Theory (BBT)?

Many people will be familiar now with the dominant theory in cosmology - that our observable Universe emerged from an incredibly small, incredibly dense space, presumably in some quantum process, and then expanded outwards. Our studies of the oldest light in the sky - the famous cosmic microwave background (CMB) - indicate this event occurred some 13.82 billion years ago. On some levels this idea seems fantastical, but when we look deep into space, it makes sense. The American astronomer Edwin Hubble showed us that the galaxies are rushing away from each other, and that the further you look, the faster they recede. Run the "movie" backwards, and everything must have been much closer together in the past. But the earliest moments are certainly hard to grasp, and scientists themselves confess that the further back you go, the more difficult the physics is to describe and comprehend.

line break

BICEP data Gravitational waves from inflation put a distinctive twist pattern in the polarisation of the CMB

So how does inflation fit in?

It's an "add on" to BBT. It proposes that about a trillionth of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second after our observable Universe got going, it went through a super-rapid expansion, taking an infinitesimally small patch of space to something about the size of a marble, before then continuing to coast outwards. (Note: space may open up faster than light, but nothing in it is moving faster than light). One of the pioneers of inflationary theory, the American Alan Guth, describes inflation "as sort of the bang in the Big Bang". And it fixes some puzzling aspects in BBT. For example, it explains why the Universe looks so smooth on the largest scales. Inflation would have stretched away any unevenness. It also explains the structure we see in the Universe - all those galaxies and clusters of galaxies. The random quantum fluctuations that existed before inflation would have been amplified to provide the seeds for everything that came after.

line break

But how do you prove this kind of thing?

Inflationary theory came with a prediction - something the experimentalists could test. It was hypothesised that the very rapid expansion would have been accompanied by waves of gravitational energy, and that these ripples in the fabric of space-time would have left an indelible mark on the CMB. Gravitational waves alternately squeeze and stretch space as they pass through it. And the primordial waves associated with inflation would likely have changed the orientation of the oldest light in the Universe. In other words, it would have polarised this light. This being the case, it should be possible to detect a very characteristic "twist" in the CMB, provided the signal is large enough and the investigations are sensitive enough. A telescope at the South Pole, operated by the Background Imaging of Cosmic Extragalactic Polarization 2 (BICEP2) project, has now claimed to have done this.

line break

If confirmed, what does this mean?

Assuming the observations are correct, it's a huge result. It represents our most direct detection yet of gravitational waves. That alone might be Nobel Prize-winning territory. But beyond that, this is a huge step for the study of the origin of the Universe. Inflation has always involved some highly speculative physics. So free was the hand of theorists that they were able to dream up literally hundreds of different models for how inflation might have worked. They can't do that anymore. The size and shape of the signal claimed by BICEP2 means many of the more exotic models will now go straight in the bin. Importantly, the discovery gives scientists an energy scale for inflation. The physics they develop to describe inflation must now fit inside that parameter. The good news is that the energies implied by BICEP2 are consistent with ideas for what is termed Grand Unified Theory. This is the realm where particle physicists believe three of the four fundamental forces in nature can be tied together.

Atlas detector at Cern Particle physicists are asking similar questions using giant accelerators like the LHC

Cosmic inflation: 'Spectacular' discovery hailed

17 March 2014 Last updated at 14:46

By Jonathan Amos Science correspondent, BBC News

Nature did not have to be so kind and the theory didn't have to be right”

                                - Prof Alan Guth Inflation pioneer

BICEP2 The measurements were taken using the BICEP2 instrument at the South Pole Telescope facility

Scientists say they have extraordinary new evidence to support a Big Bang Theory for the origin of the Universe.

Researchers believe they have found the signal left in the sky by the super-rapid expansion of space that must have occurred just fractions of a second after everything came into being.

It takes the form of a distinctive twist in the oldest light detectable with telescopes.

The work will be scrutinised carefully, but already there is talk of a Nobel.

"This is spectacular," commented Prof Marc Kamionkowski, from Johns Hopkins University.

"I've seen the research; the arguments are persuasive, and the scientists involved are among the most careful and conservative people I know," he told BBC News.

The breakthrough was announced by an American team working on a project known as BICEP2.

This has been using a telescope at the South Pole to make detailed observations of a small patch of sky.

The aim has been to try to find a residual marker for "inflation" - the idea that the cosmos experienced an exponential growth spurt in its first trillionth, of a trillionth of a trillionth of a second.

BICEP data Gravitational waves from inflation put a distinctive twist pattern in the polarisation of the CMB

Theory holds that this would have taken the infant Universe from something unimaginably small to something about the size of a marble. Space has continued to expand for the nearly 14 billion years since.

Inflation was first proposed in the early 1980s to explain some aspects of Big Bang Theory that appeared to not quite add up, such as why deep space looks broadly the same on all sides of the sky. The contention was that a very rapid expansion early on could have smoothed out any unevenness.

But inflation came with a very specific prediction - that it would be associated with waves of gravitational energy, and that these ripples in the fabric of space would leave an indelible mark on the oldest light in the sky - the famous Cosmic Microwave Background.

The BICEP2 team says it has now identified that signal. Scientists call it B-mode polarisation. It is a characteristic twist in the directional properties of the CMB. Only the gravitational waves moving through the Universe in its inflationary phase could have produced such a marker. It is a true "smoking gun".

Speaking at the press conference to announce the results, Prof John Kovac of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and a leader of the BICEP2 collaboration, said: "This is opening a window on what we believe to be a new regime of physics - the physics of what happened in the first unbelievably tiny fraction of a second in the Universe."

'Completely astounded'

The signal is reported to be quite a bit stronger than many scientists had dared hope. This simplifies matters, say experts. It means the more exotic models for how inflation worked are no longer tenable.

The results also constrain the energies involved - at 10,000 trillion gigaelectronvolts. This is consistent with ideas for what is termed Grand Unified Theory, the realm where particle physicists believe three of the four fundamental forces in nature can be tied together.

Prof Alan Guth: "Experiment is Nobel Prize worthy"

But by associating gravitational waves with an epoch when quantum effects were so dominant, scientists are improving their prospects of one day pulling the fourth force - gravity itself - into a Theory of Everything.

The sensational nature of the discovery means the BICEP2 data will be subjected to intense peer review.

It is possible for the interaction of CMB light with dust in our galaxy to produce a similar effect, but the BICEP2 group says it has carefully checked its data over the past three years to rule out such a possibility.

Other experiments will now race to try to replicate the findings.

Prof Andrew Jaffe from Imperial College London, UK, works on a rival telescope called POLARBEAR. He commented: "A lot of this is technology driven. And the next generation of experiments, like the next generation of POLARBEAR, SPIDER and EBEX, and things like that, will have far more detectors and will go after this signal and hopefully drag out much more detail."

Assuming the BICEP2 results are confirmed, a Nobel Prize seems assured.

The BBC's David Shukman explains the findings

Who this would go to is difficult to say, but leading figures on the BICEP2 project and the people who first formulated inflationary theory would be in the running.

One of those pioneers, Prof Alan Guth from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, told the BBC: "I have been completely astounded. I never believed when we started that anybody would ever measure the non-uniformities of the CMB, let alone the polarisation, which is now what we are seeing.

"I think it is absolutely amazing that it can be measured and also absolutely amazing that it can agree so well with inflation and also the simplest models of inflation - nature did not have to be so kind and the theory didn't have to be right."

British scientist Dr Jo Dunkley, who has been searching through data from the European Planck space telescope for a B-mode signal, commented: "I can't tell you how exciting this is. Inflation sounds like a crazy idea, but everything that is important, everything we see today - the galaxies, the stars, the planets - was imprinted at that moment, in less than a trillionth of a second. If this is confirmed, it's huge."

Big Bang Theory conceptual artwork "Everything we see today - the galaxies, the stars, the planets - was imprinted at that moment"