Sunday, 29 June 2014

A short summary of the neutrino history

 


1898
Discovery of the radioactivity
The first car's races (70 km/h maximum!)
1926
Problem with beta radioactivity
Between two wars, people dance the Charleston and the Boston
1930
Pauli invents the neutrino particle
Crisis of 1929...
1933
Fermi baptizes the neutrino and builds his theory of weak interaction
Hitler gets power in Germany
1956
First discovery of the neutrino by an experiment nue
Riots in Budapest. Indochina. Cold war. Atmospheric tests of thermonuclear bombs.
1962
Discovery of an other type of neutrino: the numu
Missiles of Cuba, not far from the End!
1974
Discovery of neutral currents thanks to the neutrinos
Energy crisis... first oil problem
1977
Discovery of the tau (co-particle of nutau)
Energy crisis... second oil problem
1985-1989
Pseudo-discovery of a neutrino at 17 keV
The man on the moon 20 years ago. Mutations in European East countries
1990
The mystery of dark matter comes again
Berlin wall finally has fallen! It was on 11th of November 1989.
1991
LEP experiments show that there are only three light neutrinos
Eltsine is the new President of Russia. Iraq invades Koweit
1994
First proclamation of possible neutrinos oscillations seen by LSND experiment
Rwanda, Yugoslavia, Tchetchenia...
1995
Missing solar neutrinos confirmed by GALLEX
Internet and its WWW explode... and LAPP is 19 years old
1998
May be neutrinos oscillations seen in LSND and Super-Kamiokande
Human rights declaration is 50 years old, 1968 is 30 years old

http://lappweb.in2p3.fr/neutrinos/aneut.html#resume

The science of matter, space and time: What is the world made of?

 

The building blocks

Physicists have identified 12 building blocks that are the fundamental constituents of matter. Our everyday world is made of just three of these building blocks: the up quark, the down quark and the electron. This set of particles is all that's needed to make protons and neutrons and to form atoms and molecules. The electron neutrino, observed in the decay of other particles, completes the first set of four building blocks.

photo

The building blocks of matter: six quarks and six leptons.

For some reason nature has elected to replicate this first generation of quarks and leptons to produce a total of six quarks and six leptons, with increasing mass. Like all quarks, the sixth quark, named top, is much smaller than a proton (in fact, no one knows how small quarks are), but the top is as heavy as a gold atom!

Although there are reasons to believe that there are no more sets of quarks and leptons, theorists speculate that there may be other types of building blocks, which may partly account for the dark matter implied by astrophysical observations. This poorly understood matter exerts gravitational forces and manipulates galaxies. It will take earth-based accelerator experiments to identify its fabric.

The building blocks of nature (video, 6 min.)

The forces

Scientists distinguish four elementary types of forces acting among particles: strong, weak, electromagnetic and gravitational force.

  • The strong force is responsible for quarks “sticking” together to form protons, neutrons and related particles.
  • The electromagnetic force binds electrons to atomic nuclei (clusters of protons and neutrons) to form atoms.
  • The weak force facilitates the decay of heavy particles into smaller siblings.
  • The gravitational force acts between massive objects. Although it plays no role at the microscopic level, it is the dominant force in our everyday life and throughout the universe.

photo

Particles transmit forces among each other by exchanging force-carrying particles called bosons. These force mediators carry discrete amounts of energy, called quanta, from one particle to another. You could think of the energy transfer due to boson exchange as something like the passing of a basketball between two players.

Each force has its own characteristic bosons:

  • The gluon mediates the strong force; it “glues” quarks together.
  • The photon carries the electromagnetic force; it also transmits light.
  • The W and Z bosons represent the weak force; they introduce different types of decays.

Physicists expect that the gravitational force may also be associated with a boson particle. Named the graviton, this hypothetical boson is extremely hard to observe since, at the subatomic level, the gravitational force is many orders of magnitude weaker than the other three elementary forces.

Table of particle discoveries: who, when, where?

Antimatter

Although it is a staple of science fiction, antimatter is as real as matter. For every particle, physicists have discovered a corresponding antiparticle, which looks and behaves in almost the same way. Antiparticles, though, have the opposite properties of their corresponding particles. An antiproton, for example, has a negative electric charge while a proton is positively charged.

Less than 10 years ago, physicists at CERN (1995) and Fermilab (1996) created the first anti-atoms. To learn more about the properties of the "Mirror World," they carefully added a positron (the antiparticle of an electron) to an antiproton. The result: antihydrogen.

Storing antimatter is a difficult task. As soon as an antiparticle and a particle meet, they annihilate, disappearing in a flash of energy. Using electromagnetic force fields, physicists are able to store antimatter inside vacuum vessels for a limited amount of time.

The Standard Model

photo

The Standard Model explains the complex interplay between force carriers and building blocks.

Physicists call the theoretical framework that describes the interactions between elementary building blocks (quarks and leptons) and the force carriers (bosons) the Standard Model. Gravity is not yet part of this framework, and a central question of 21st century particle physics is the search for a quantum formulation of gravity that could be included in the Standard Model.

Though still called a model, the Standard Model is a fundamental and well-tested physics theory. Physicists use it to explain and calculate a vast variety of particle interactions and quantum phenomena. High-precision experiments have repeatedly verified subtle effects predicted by the Standard Model.

So far, the biggest success of the Standard Model is the unification of the electromagnetic and the weak forces into the so-called electroweak force. The consolidation is a milestone comparable to the unification of the electric and the magnetic forces into a single electromagnetic theory by J.C. Maxwell in the 19th century. Physicists think it is possible to describe all forces with a Grand Unified Theory.

One essential ingredient of the Standard Model, however, still eludes experimental verification: the Higgs field. It interacts with other particles to give them mass. The Higgs field gives rise to a new force carrier, called the Higgs boson, which has not been observed. Failure to find it would call into question the Standard Model. Experimenters at Fermilab hope to find evidence for the Higgs boson and make further discoveries in the next few years.

Slide show on the building blocks of nature

Everything about neutrinos, electrons and light.

How to find the smallest particles

Fermilab's research on elementary particles

நன்றி: http://www.fnal.gov/pub/science/inquiring/matter/madeof/

Saturday, 28 June 2014

How Do We Know When Voyager Reaches Interstellar Space?

September 12, 2013

This artist's concept shows NASA's Voyager spacecraft against a backdrop of stars. You Are Here, Voyager: This artist's concept puts huge solar system distances in perspective. The scale bar is measured in astronomical units (AU), with each set distance beyond 1 AU representing 10 times the previous distance. Each AU is equal to the distance from the sun to the Earth. It took from 1977 to 2013 for Voyager 1 to reach the edge of interstellar space. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

Whether and when NASA's Voyager 1 spacecraft, humankind's most distant object, broke through to interstellar space, the space between stars, has been a thorny issue. For the last year, claims have surfaced every few months that Voyager 1 has "left our solar system." Why has the Voyager team held off from saying the craft reached interstellar space until now?

"We have been cautious because we're dealing with one of the most important milestones in the history of exploration," said Voyager Project Scientist Ed Stone of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. "Only now do we have the data -- and the analysis -- we needed."

Basically, the team needed more data on plasma, which is ionized gas, the densest and slowest moving of charged particles in space. (The glow of neon in a storefront sign is an example of plasma.) Plasma is the most important marker that distinguishes whether Voyager 1 is inside the solar bubble, known as the heliosphere, which is inflated by plasma that streams outward from our sun, or in interstellar space and surrounded by material ejected by the explosion of nearby giant stars millions of years ago. Adding to the challenge: they didn't know how they'd be able to detect it.

"We looked for the signs predicted by the models that use the best available data, but until now we had no measurements of the plasma from Voyager 1," said Stone.
Scientific debates can take years, even decades to settle, especially when more data are needed. It took decades, for instance, for scientists to understand the idea of plate tectonics, the theory that explains the shape of Earth's continents and the structure of its sea floors. First introduced in the 1910s, continental drift and related ideas were controversial for years.

A mature theory of plate tectonics didn't emerge until the 1950s and 1960s. Only after scientists gathered data showing that sea floors slowly spread out from mid-ocean ridges did they finally start accepting the theory. Most active geophysicists accepted plate tectonics by the late 1960s, though some never did.

Voyager 1 is exploring an even more unfamiliar place than our Earth's sea floors -- a place more than 11 billion miles (17 billion kilometers) away from our sun. It has been sending back so much unexpected data that the science team has been grappling with the question of how to explain all the information. None of the handful of models the Voyager team uses as blueprints have accounted for the observations about the transition between our heliosphere and the interstellar medium in detail. The team has known it might take months, or longer, to understand the data fully and draw their conclusions.

"No one has been to interstellar space before, and it's like traveling with guidebooks that are incomplete," said Stone. "Still, uncertainty is part of exploration. We wouldn't go exploring if we knew exactly what we'd find."

The two Voyager spacecraft were launched in 1977 and, between them, had visited Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune by 1989. Voyager 1's plasma instrument, which measures the density, temperature and speed of plasma, stopped working in 1980, right after its last planetary flyby. When Voyager 1 detected the pressure of interstellar space on our heliosphere in 2004, the science team didn't have the instrument that would provide the most direct measurements of plasma. Instead, they focused on the direction of the magnetic field as a proxy for source of the plasma. Since solar plasma carries the magnetic field lines emanating from the sun and interstellar plasma carries interstellar magnetic field lines, the directions of the solar and interstellar magnetic fields were expected to differ.

Most models told the Voyager science team to expect an abrupt change in the magnetic field direction as Voyager switched from the solar magnetic field lines inside our solar bubble to those in interstellar space. The models also said to expect the levels of charged particles originating from inside the heliosphere to drop and the levels of galactic cosmic rays, which originate outside the heliosphere, to jump.

In May 2012, the number of galactic cosmic rays made its first significant jump, while some of the inside particles made their first significant dip. The pace of change quickened dramatically on July 28, 2012. After five days, the intensities returned to what they had been. This was the first taste of a new region, and at the time Voyager scientists thought the spacecraft might have briefly touched the edge of interstellar space.
By Aug. 25, when, as we now know, Voyager 1 entered this new region for good, all the lower-energy particles from inside zipped away. Some inside particles dropped by more than a factor of 1,000 compared to 2004. The levels of galactic cosmic rays jumped to the highest of the entire mission. These would be the expected changes if Voyager 1 had crossed the heliopause, which is the boundary between the heliosphere and interstellar space. However, subsequent analysis of the magnetic field data revealed that even though the magnetic field strength jumped by 60 percent at the boundary, the direction changed less than 2 degrees. This suggested that Voyager 1 had not left the solar magnetic field and had only entered a new region, still inside our solar bubble, that had been depleted of inside particles.

Then, in April 2013, scientists got another piece of the puzzle by chance. For the first eight years of exploring the heliosheath, which is the outer layer of the heliosphere, Voyager's plasma wave instrument had heard nothing. But the plasma wave science team, led by Don Gurnett and Bill Kurth at the University of Iowa, Iowa City, had observed bursts of radio waves in 1983 to 1984 and again in 1992 to 1993. They deduced these bursts were produced by the interstellar plasma when a large outburst of solar material would plow into it and cause it to oscillate. It took about 400 days for such solar outbursts to reach interstellar space, leading to an estimated distance of 117 to 177 AU (117 to 177 times the distance from the sun to the Earth) to the heliopause. They knew, though, that they would be able to observe plasma oscillations directly once Voyager 1 was surrounded by interstellar plasma.

Then on April 9, 2013, it happened: Voyager 1's plasma wave instrument picked up local plasma oscillations. Scientists think they probably stemmed from a burst of solar activity from a year before, a burst that has become known as the St. Patrick's Day Solar Storms. The oscillations increased in pitch through May 22 and indicated that Voyager was moving into an increasingly dense region of plasma. This plasma had the signatures of interstellar plasma, with a density more than 40 times that observed by Voyager 2 in the heliosheath.

Gurnett and Kurth began going through the recent data and found a fainter, lower-frequency set of oscillations from Oct. 23 to Nov. 27, 2012. When they extrapolated back, they deduced that Voyager had first encountered this dense interstellar plasma in August 2012, consistent with the sharp boundaries in the charged particle and magnetic field data on August 25.

Stone called three meetings of the Voyager team. They had to decide how to define the boundary between our solar bubble and interstellar space and how to interpret all the data Voyager 1 had been sending back. There was general agreement Voyager 1 was seeing interstellar plasma, based on the results from Gurnett and Kurth, but the sun still had influence. One persisting sign of solar influence, for example, was the detection of outside particles hitting Voyager from some directions more than others. In interstellar space, these particles would be expected to hit Voyager uniformly from all directions.
"Now that we had actual measurements of the plasma environment - by way of an unexpected outburst from the sun - we had to reconsider why there was still solar influence on the magnetic field and plasma in interstellar space," Stone said. "The path to interstellar space has been a lot more complicated than we imagined."
Stone discussed with the Voyager science group whether they thought Voyager 1 had crossed the heliopause. What should they call the region were Voyager 1 is?
"In the end, there was general agreement that Voyager 1 was indeed outside in interstellar space," Stone said. "But that location comes with some disclaimers - we're in a mixed, transitional region of interstellar space. We don't know when we'll reach interstellar space free from the influence of our solar bubble."

So, would the team say Voyager 1 has left the solar system? Not exactly - and that's part of the confusion. Since the 1960s, most scientists have defined our solar system as going out to the Oort Cloud, where the comets that swing by our sun on long timescales originate. That area is where the gravity of other stars begins to dominate that of the sun. It will take about 300 years for Voyager 1 to reach the inner edge of the Oort Cloud and possibly about 30,000 years to fly beyond it. Informally, of course, "solar system" typically means the planetary neighborhood around our sun. Because of this ambiguity, the Voyager team has lately favored talking about interstellar space, which is specifically the space between each star's realm of plasma influence.

"What we can say is Voyager 1 is bathed in matter from other stars," Stone said. "What we can't say is what exact discoveries await Voyager's continued journey. No one was able to predict all of the details that Voyager 1 has seen. So we expect more surprises."
Voyager 1, which is working with a finite power supply, has enough electrical power to keep operating the fields and particles science instruments through at least 2020, which will mark 43 years of continual operation. At that point, mission managers will have to start turning off these instruments one by one to conserve power, with the last one turning off around 2025.

Voyager 1 will continue sending engineering data for a few more years after the last science instrument is turned off, but after that it will be sailing on as a silent ambassador. In about 40,000 years, it will be closer to the star AC +79 3888 than our own sun. (AC +79 3888 is traveling toward us faster than we are traveling towards it, so while Alpha Centauri is the next closest star now, it won't be in 40,000 years.) And for the rest of time, Voyager 1 will continue orbiting around the heart of the Milky Way galaxy, with our sun but a tiny point of light among many

The Voyager spacecraft were built and continue to be operated by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in Pasadena, Calif. Caltech manages JPL for NASA. The Voyager missions are a part of NASA's Heliophysics System Observatory, sponsored by the Heliophysics Division of the Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington.
For more information about Voyager, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/voyager and http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov.

Voyager 1 has entered interstellar space. NASA's spacecraft, which rose from Earth on a September morning 36 years ago, has traveled farther than anyone, or anything, in history.

Voyager Goes Interstellar (Artist Concept)

This artist's concept puts solar system distances in perspective. The scale bar is in astronomical units, with each set distance beyond 1 AU representing 10 times the previous distance. One AU is the distance from the sun to the Earth, which is about 93 million miles or 150 million kilometers. Neptune, the most distant planet from the sun, is about 30 AU.

Informally, the term "solar system" is often used to mean the space out to the last planet. Scientific consensus, however, says the solar system goes out to the Oort Cloud, the source of the comets that swing by our sun on long time scales. Beyond the outer edge of the Oort Cloud, the gravity of other stars begins to dominate that of the sun.

The inner edge of the main part of the Oort Cloud could be as close as 1,000 AU from our sun. The outer edge is estimated to be around 100,000 AU.

NASA's Voyager 1, humankind's most distant spacecraft, is around 125 AU. Scientists believe it entered interstellar space, or the space between stars, on Aug. 25, 2012. Much of interstellar space is actually inside our solar system. It will take about 300 years for Voyager 1 to reach the inner edge of the Oort Cloud and possibly about 30,000 years to fly beyond it.

Alpha Centauri is currently the closest star to our solar system. But, in 40,000 years, Voyager 1 will be closer to the star AC +79 3888 than to our own sun. AC +79 3888 is actually traveling faster toward Voyager 1 than the spacecraft is traveling toward it.

The Voyager spacecraft were built and continue to be operated by NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory, in Pasadena, Calif. Caltech manages JPL for NASA. The Voyager missions are a part of NASA's Heliophysics System Observatory, sponsored by the Heliophysics Division of the Science Mission Directorate at NASA Headquarters in Washington.

For more information about Voyager, visit http://www.nasa.gov/voyager and http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov.

Passing Into the Energy Cloud

Lawrence E. Joseph

Lawrence E. Joseph

Author, "AFTERMATH: A Guide to Preparing for and Surviving Apocalypse 2012

Solar Storm Warning

On Christmas Eve, 2009, the startling hypothesis that our Solar System, the Sun and all its planets, are moving into a potentially dangerous and destabilizing interstellar energy cloud, was resoundingly sustained. In their research paper, "A strong, highly-tilted interstellar magnetic field near the Solar System," published the December 24, 2009 issue of Nature, a highly respected scientific journal, M. Opher et al report on data transmitted from Voyager, the twin spacecraft that have been exploring the outer reaches of the Solar System since 1977.

"We have discovered a strong magnetic field just outside the solar system. This magnetic field holds the interstellar energy cloud together and solves the long-standing puzzle of how it can exist at all," says Opher, a NASA Heliophysics Guest Investigator from George Mason University. He explains that this energy cloud is at least twice as strong as had previously been predicted and that the Solar System has begun to pass into it, adding that this field "is turbulent or has a distortion in the solar vicinity."

In fact, most scientists had either minimized the possible significance of the interstellar energy cloud or dismissed the whole notion of its existence altogether. But not Dr. Alexei Dmitriev, the esteemed Russian space physicist whom I visited in Akademgorodok, a clandestine scientific research city outside of Novosibirsk, Siberia. In my recent book, Apocalypse 2012: An Investigation into Civilization's End, I detailed Dmitriev's conclusions, based on his team's analysis of Voyager data, that the atmospheres of Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune are inexplicably excited -- immense storms, mammoth eruptions, plasma arcs jetting from the planets' surface to their moons. He reasoned that this turbulence is caused by an external injection of energy into the planets' atmospheres: to wit, an interstellar energy cloud which the leading edge of the Solar System has now entered.

The Nature article does not examine the earthly ramifications of moving into the energy cloud beyond suggesting that we could face an increase in cosmic rays, which could affect everything from space travel to rainfall. But the prescient Dmitriev, who has been publishing on the subject for the past fifteen years, observes that passage into this interstellar cloud has already begun to perturb the Sun, causing solar outbursts that are leading to hurricanes, earthquakes and volcanoes of unprecedented ferocity here on Earth. He is on record as predicting that we will face global catastrophe in "not tens but ones of years." When pressed, Dmitriev guesstimates that the Solar System will remain within this turbulent energy cloud for something on the order of three millennia.

The confirmation of Dmitriev's interstellar energy cloud hypothesis marks the third time that major predictions made in Apocalypse 2012 have been validated since it was published in 2007. Much of the book concerned the potential impacts of solar turbulence on climatic and seismic events, on the global satellite network and also the electrical power grid. Lo and behold, in December, 2008, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) issued a 100+ page report detailing the grave vulnerability of the electrical power grid to solar blasts, which, by scientific consensus, are next expected to climax in late 2012 or early 2013. The NAS concludes that up to 130 million people could find themselves without electricity for months or years due to solar mega-storms shorting out the grid. Without telecommunications, water or gasoline (the pumps are electric), refrigeration, and basic law enforcement or military security, civilization as we know it would be brought to its knees.

Apocalypse 2012 also reported extensively on evidence that the Earth's protective magnetic shield is showing signs of realignment and deterioration, a hypothesis emphatically validated in December, 2008, THEMIS, a squadron of five NASA research satellites unexpectedly flew through a giant, pole-to-equator breach in our planet's magnetic field. The astrophysicists attached to the THEMIS project were utterly astonished by the e data, with David Sibeck, the project leader, going so far as to declare that "it was as though the Sun rose in the west." The shields are down, Scotty, and the Sun is going to begin pummeling us big time in late 2012 or early 2013.

Our space neighborhood is changing, and not for the better. We need to take precautions to defend our home planet, our way of life, starting right now.

http://www.solar-storm-warning.com/news_Passing_Into_the_Energy_Cloud.html

Mysterious X-ray signal could be dark matter candidate

DARK MATTER

Washington, Jun 25 (PTI) Scientists have detected a possible signal of the elusive dark matter, the mysterious, invisible stuff that makes up most of the matter in the
universe.

A mysterious X-ray signal found in a detailed study of galaxy clusters may be produced by the decay of sterile neutrinos, a type of particle that has been proposed as a
candidate for dark matter, scientists said.

While holding exciting potential, these results must be confirmed with additional data to rule out other explanations and determine whether it is plausible that dark matter has
been observed, researchers said.

Astronomers think dark matter constitutes 85 per cent of the matter in the universe, but does not emit or absorb light like "normal" matter such as protons, neutrons and electrons
that make up the familiar elements observed in planets, stars, and galaxies.

Because of this, scientists must use indirect methods to search for clues about dark matter.

The latest results from NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory and ESA's XMM-Newton consist of an unidentified X-ray emission line, that is, a spike of intensity at a very specific
wavelength of X-ray light.

Astronomers detected this emission line in the Perseus galaxy cluster. They also found the line in a combined study of 73 other galaxy clusters with XMM-Newton.

"We know that the dark matter explanation is a long shot, but the pay-off would be huge if we're right," said Esra Bulbul of the Harvard-Smithsonian Centre for Astrophysics
(CfA) in Cambridge, who led the study.

"So we're going to keep testing this interpretation and see where it takes us," said Bulbul.
The authors suggest this emission line could be a signature from the decay of a "sterile neutrino."

Sterile neutrinos are a hypothetical type of neutrino that is predicted to interact with normal matter only via gravity. Some scientists have proposed that sterile neutrinos
may at least partially explain dark matter.

"We have a lot of work to do before we can claim, with any confidence, that we've found sterile neutrinos," said Maxim Markevitch, a co-author from NASA's Goddard Space Flight
Centre in Greenbelt, Maryland.

"But just the possibility of finding them has us very excited," said Markevitch.

One source of uncertainty is that the detection of this emission line is pushing the capabilities of the two observatories in terms of sensitivity.

Also, there may be explanations other than sterile neutrinos if this X-ray emission line is deemed to be real.

There are ways that normal matter in the cluster could have produced the line, although the team's analysis suggested that all of these would involve unlikely changes to our
understanding of physical conditions in the galaxy cluster or the details of the atomic physics of extremely hot gases.

The research was published in The Astrophysical Journal.

PTI

The Present Theory of Fundamental Particles and Forces

An Article Written Originally for Midlevel Teachers

 

Before World War II, it was known that the nucleus was composed of closely packed protons and neutrons, but little was known about the "strong force" that kept them together.

From 1950 to 1970, accelerators were built which were designed to probe nuclei with higher speed and more energetic, charged particles such as electrons and protons. The result was that hundreds of new particles were discovered and their properties defined.

In 1963, a theory was proposed that a major group of these particles, called hadrons, could be thought of as made from a few, more fundamental particles, called quarks. Protons and neutrons are members of the hadron group.

Quarks are proposed to be the simplest, irreducible, structureless building blocks of hadrons. The Quark Hypothesis states that quarks in combinations of two or three, make all the observed hadrons.

In 1963, the three quarks were named: up (u), down (d), and strange (s). In 1974, the existence of Charm quark (c) was revealed and in 1977, Leon Lederman and his collegues at Fermilab uncovered the fifth quark, bottom (b). A neutron is composed of three quarks: u d d; a proton is u u d; and a lambda is u d s. One more quark, top (t), has been found at Fermilab in 1995.

Electrons, neutrinos, and a few other particles make up another group of particles called leptons. Leptons are not considered divisible and are not made up of quarks.

The results of particle physicists' theoretical and experimental work up to 1985 might be summarized this way:

All matter is thought to be made up of quarks and leptons and the forces through which they interact. There are six quarks (each comes in three "colors" making 18 particles and each has an antiparticle making 36 quarks in total.) The six quarks are named up (u), down (d), strange (s), charm (c), bottom (b), and top (t). (The last two are sometimes fancifully referred to as "beauty" and "truth.") The six quarks have been confirmed through indirect observations, but not isolated as individual particles.

The other six particles (also appearing in antiparticle form, making 12 total) are the leptons. These include electrons (e), electron neutrinos (ue), muons (m), muon neutrinos (um), tau particles (t), and tau neutrinos (ut).

The twelve particles (48 in all if you include colors and antiparticles) are subject to the four fundamental forces of nature. These forces are gravity, electromagnetic, strong, and weak. Each force is defined by the way it interacts with particles to build up composite form of matter: protons, neutrons, nuclei, atoms, molecules, planets, stars, and so on.

Each of the forces has a strength, a range, and a "carrier" particle as outlined in the table below.

One of the fundamental quests of the Fermilab scientists is to find an underlying link to unify the four basic forces. This Unification Theory would link all particles and forces into a coherent and simple description of nature.
In order to "observe" the basic particles of matter and collect data which may be of use toward theory development and perhaps the Unification Theory, particle probes with great amounts of energy are needed. The protons with 1000 GeV (1 TeV) energy now available in Fermilab's accelerator will help in this quest. By creating head-on collisions between these protons and 1000 GeV antiprotons (generated earlier in stationary target collisions in a nearby storage ring) circulating in the opposite direction, 2000 GeV collision data will be generated.

The main purpose of Fermilab and other large particle accelerators is to collect data that will support or refute theories. The need for new and better data is continuous. Numerous experiments remain to be done and each new theory and the related attempts at experimental verification inevitably lead to new insights as well as new questions about the most fundamental particles and forces that form all matter.

http://ed.fnal.gov/tchrbkground/theory.html

12 Particles Of Matter And 4 Forces Of Nature

 

December 19, 2011 by SFScience

Seeing Professor Brian Cox on A Night With The Stars last night reminded me that I had not finished writing this post about the fundamental particles of matter.  The idea came from a video that quotes Prof Cox in the chorus referring to the twelve particles of matter and the four forces of nature. Many of you know that the four forces of nature are: gravity, electromagnetism, the weak nuclear force and the strong nuclear force.

Four Forces Of Nature

Gravity is the very weak force of attraction that exists between all objects. The more massive the object, the greater the force. Gravity on Earth is about 10N/kg – so every kg of your matter is pulled towards the centre of the Earth with a force of about 10 Newton. You can read a little bit more about it on this blog by starting here or by searching for the word gravity. The moon, which is a quarter the size of the earth has a gravitational force just 1/6th  that on Earth – so your weight on the moon would be just 1/6th what it is on Earth. You would definitely be able to set a high jump personal best.

The electromagnetic force exists between charged particles. It is the force responsible for electric current, magnetism and light (a form of electromagnetic radiation). Any wire carrying a current also has a magnetic field around it. You can find out more about electromagnets from this blog post. It is the force that gives you an electric shock from the static charges built up by a Van Der Graaf generator; it is also the force that prevents you from passing your hand through solid objects.

Then there is the more mysterious ‘strong force’. This is the force that holds protons and neutrons together. Its effect, unlike gravity or the electromagnetic force, are local; it doesn’t reach outside the proton or neutron. Protons are positively charged particles in the nucleus of atoms, neutrons are (as the name suggests) neutral so have no overall charge. Between them they give atoms their mass. For example, a hydrogen atom has one proton in its nucleus so we say that the relative mass of hydrogen is 1. A carbon atom has six protons and six neutrons so the relative atomic mass of carbon is 12.

The last fundamental force of nature is known as the weak force (or weak interaction). Like the strong force, this acts at the subatomic level so we don’t experience it directly. It is the force that is responsible for atomic decay and radiation. It is also the force that allows hydrogen atoms to fuse into helium inside stars. This last process is the one that produces all the sun’s light and heat so it is quite important! You can read about the Sun here and about nuclear fusion more generally here.

Twelve Particles Of Matter

Giving you a clear definition of the 12 fundamental particles of matter is less simple because for every statement a lengthy explanation seems to be needed. Physics uses something called the standard model, to describe the 12 fermions that make up the basic set of particles. These twelve fermions are divided into two sets of six quarks and six leptons. The quarks are called up, down, strange, charm, top and bottom. The leptons are called the electron, electron neutrino, muon, muon neutrino, tau and tau neutrino.

There are also the force carrying particles called bosons. They are photons (responsible for the electromagnetic force), W and Z bosons that cause the weak force and gluons that result in the strong force. There may also be a boson caused the Higgs boson that would help to explain gravity.

Thus, a proton is made from two up quarks and a down quark held together with gluons. A neutron is built from two down quarks and an up quark, again with gluons providing the force that holds them together. The large hadron collider at CERN accelerates protons to a fraction of the speed of light and smashes them up in detectors that can see the quarks, leptons and bosons flying out of the wreckage. You can read a little more about the LHC here.

Questions…
  1. Suggest three ways you could make the electromagnet shown above stronger.
  2. Name a force (not mentioned above) that tends to oppose motion and often results in the production of heat.
  3. A man has a mass of 76kg on earth. What would his mass be (a) on the moon (b) in deep space? What would his weight be (in Newton) (c) on the moon (d) in deep space?
  4. How fast do photons travel through a vacuüm (choose your units!)?